Fire Evacuation Simulator Dynamic Detour Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional simulators for fire evacuation lack the ability to simulate realistic occupant behavior by not considering detour routes when flames or smoke obstruct the path to exits, leading to unrealistic escape scenarios and unreliable safety assessments.

Innovation Solution

A simulation apparatus and method that includes an evacuation unit capable of generating detour paths for occupants based on fire and obstacle presence, using building and fire information to calculate distances and risk levels, allowing for dynamic route selection and visualization of fire and evacuation simulations integrated together.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional simulators use only three categories of exit selection models (shortest distance, shortest time, user designation), then the device complexity is low and ease of operation is high, but the reliability of evacuation simulation is poor because realistic occupant detour behavior cannot be incorporated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of evacuation simulationVSAvoidcomplexity of exit selection model
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exit selection model transitions from static (fixed three categories) to dynamic by allowing occupants to adaptively switch between shortest distance, shortest time, and detour routes based on real-time fire conditions. The simulation dynamically recalculates optimal paths as fire spreads, making the model responsive to changing environmental conditions rather than relying on predetermined static routes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters including occupancy behavior patterns (from passive to active detour decision-making), exit selection criteria (from fixed three categories to dynamic multi-criteria), and simulation integration level (from separate fire and evacuation simulations to integrated coupled simulation). These parameter changes enable realistic detour behavior while maintaining computational feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fire simulation and evacuation simulation are executed separately, then the device complexity is low and ease of manufacture is high, but the reliability of escape safety assessment is poor because unrealistic escape behavior is described

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of escape safety assessmentVSAvoidintegration complexity of simulation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges fire simulation and evacuation simulation into a single integrated system where both simulations operate simultaneously and interactively. The fire simulation provides real-time environmental data (smoke concentration, temperature, fire location) that directly influences evacuation behavior, while evacuation simulation results feed back to assess escape safety under realistic conditions. This coupling eliminates the unrealistic behavior inherent in separate executions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated simulation system implements feedback loops where fire simulation results continuously inform evacuation route selection, and evacuation progress feedback modifies fire simulation boundary conditions. This bidirectional feedback mechanism ensures that evacuation behavior responds realistically to fire conditions while maintaining system consistency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If detour paths are generated to bypass limiting factors (flame, smoke, obstacles), then the reliability of evacuation simulation improves by accounting for realistic occupant behavior, but the calculation complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealism of occupant behavior simulationVSAvoidcalculation time for route selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations by pre-identifying potential detour routes and limiting factor locations before full evacuation simulation begins. Exit selection models are pre-configured with multiple route options, and fire simulation pre-calculates potential hazard zones. This preliminary preparation reduces real-time computational burden during actual evacuation scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation applies partial action by implementing detour behavior selectively rather than universally - only for occupants whose paths are blocked by limiting factors, while others continue with shortest distance routes. This selective application reduces overall computational complexity while maintaining realism where needed, avoiding excessive calculation for all occupants regardless of actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230102509A1Simulation apparatus and method for fire evacuation
Publication Date: 2023.03.30 UNIV OF SEOUL IND COOP FOUND
  • US20230102509A1 patent drawing
  • US20230102509A1 patent drawing
  • US20230102509A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a simulation apparatus. The simulation apparatus may include an evacuation unit configured to simulate evacuation routes for occupants who are in a building when the building is on fire.