Intelligent Evacuation System with Dynamic Route Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smoke detection systems in buildings often fail to effectively guide occupants to safe evacuation routes during emergencies, leading to casualties due to confusion, poor visibility, and unfamiliarity with the building layout.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent evacuation system that uses sensory nodes and decision nodes to detect occupancy and evacuation conditions, determining and conveying safe evacuation routes through audible messages and alerting emergency responders, while also adjusting node sensitivity based on condition severity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional smoke detectors are used to detect fire, then fire detection capability is provided, but occupants cannot effectively evacuate due to confusion, poor visibility, and lack of evacuation route information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation effectivenessVSAvoidevacuation route information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback to occupants about evacuation routes by detecting smoke conditions and dynamically directing occupants away from affected areas. The notification devices provide continuous updates on safe evacuation paths based on current fire conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary intelligence layer between the smoke detection and occupants. This intermediary processes smoke detector data, determines safe evacuation routes, and communicates this information to occupants through notification devices, bridging the information gap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple exits are provided in a building, then evacuation options are increased, but occupants cannot determine which exit is safest during an emergency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation route optionsVSAvoidsafe exit identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically directs occupants to specific exits based on real-time smoke detection data. Rather than providing static exit information, the system adapts evacuation route recommendations based on the current fire location and spread, guiding occupants to the safest available exit at any given moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different evacuation guidance to different locations within the building. Each area receives customized evacuation route information based on its proximity to the fire and the safety of various exit paths from that specific location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If occupancy information is collected from multiple nodes, then evacuation route determination accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy detection accuracyVSAvoidnode network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the building into multiple zones with individual occupancy sensors and notification devices. Each zone operates semi-independently, detecting occupancy locally and receiving centralized evacuation route instructions, which distributes the computational burden and reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8970365B2Evacuation system
Publication Date: 2015.03.03 ONEEVENT TECH
  • US8970365B2 patent drawing
  • US8970365B2 patent drawing
  • US8970365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving, at a server, an indication of an evacuation condition from a sensory node located in a structure. The method also includes determining a severity of the evacuation condition. The method further includes adjusting a sensitivity of at least one sensory node in the structure based at least part on the severity of the evacuation condition.