Evaluation Apparatus Using Category-Support Variable Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Evaluating an evaluation target using multiple indicators is often complex and inaccurate due to the large number of feature values generated when combining explanatory variables, making it difficult to comprehensively assess the target effectively.

Innovation Solution

An evaluation apparatus and method that acquire combination determination information to combine category variables with support variables, determining groups based on category variable values and generating evaluation information using statistics of support variables within these groups, thereby simplifying the evaluation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple indicators are combined to comprehensively evaluate an evaluation target, then evaluation comprehensiveness is improved, but evaluation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process by dividing multiple indicators into a category variable and support variables. The category variable serves as the primary classification dimension, while support variables provide detailed evaluation within each category. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation without requiring all indicators to be processed simultaneously, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple indicators are combined to comprehensively evaluate an evaluation target, then evaluation comprehensiveness is improved, but evaluation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces the category variable as an intermediary that mediates between multiple support variables and the final evaluation result. The category variable groups related support variables together, allowing the evaluation system to process multiple indicators systematically. This intermediary structure prevents information loss and maintains evaluation accuracy by organizing indicators in a hierarchical manner rather than treating them as a flat set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If a large number of feature values are generated by combining explanatory variables, then data analysis capability is improved, but the number of feature values becomes too great

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis capabilityVSAvoidnumber of feature values
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by organizing the large set of generated feature values into groups based on the category variable. Instead of processing all feature values individually, the system segments them into manageable subsets associated with each category. This allows effective data analysis while controlling the computational burden by processing segmented data rather than the complete set of all possible feature values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240119107A1Evaluation apparatus, evaluation method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 NEC CORP
  • US20240119107A1 patent drawing
  • US20240119107A1 patent drawing
  • US20240119107A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An evaluation apparatus includes a combination acquisition unit and an evaluation unit. The combination acquisition unit acquires combination determination information from an indicator selection apparatus. The combination determination information determines a combination of a category variable being one of a plurality of indicators related to an evaluation target and at least one support variable each being the indicator different from the category variable. Further, a plurality of groups are determined based on a value of the category variable. Then, a statistic of the support variable is generated for each of the plurality of groups. The evaluation unit generates, for each of the support variables, evaluation information, for example, an evaluation value by using a value of the support variable of the evaluation target and the statistic of the support variable of the group to which the value of the category variable of the evaluation target belongs.