Evaluation Specification Refinement Through Threat-Vulnerability Linking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing risk evaluation countermeasure planning systems fail to effectively associate threat analysis, vulnerability analysis, and security tests, leading to incomplete evaluations of evaluation target devices.

Innovation Solution

An evaluation support system that performs first and second association processing to concatenate threat and vulnerability analysis information with evaluation specifications, and re-defines these specifications to ensure comprehensive evaluation, including feedback mechanisms for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If threat analysis information and vulnerability analysis information are separately processed without association, then the evaluation process is simpler, but the evaluation completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines threat analysis information and vulnerability analysis information into a unified evaluation framework by performing association processing that links threats, vulnerabilities, and evaluation specifications together, ensuring comprehensive evaluation without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an association processing mechanism as an intermediary that connects threat analysis results, vulnerability analysis results, and evaluation specifications, enabling integrated evaluation while maintaining modular system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If evaluation specifications are not re-defined based on analysis results, then the processing time is shorter, but the evaluation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary association processing to concatenate threat and vulnerability analysis information with evaluation specifications before the actual evaluation, preparing refined evaluation specifications in advance to improve accuracy without significant time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where evaluation specifications are re-defined based on the results of threat and vulnerability analysis, creating an iterative process that improves evaluation accuracy through systematic refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250291937A1Evaluation support system and evaluation support method
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US20250291937A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291937A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291937A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An evaluation support system includes a threat concatenator that performs first association processing for concatenating at least part of threat analysis information with first evaluation specification information, the threat analysis information indicating a result of analysis of a threat to information security of an evaluation target device, the first evaluation specification information indicating one or more evaluation specifications of the evaluation target device; a vulnerability concatenator that performs second association processing for concatenating at least part of vulnerability analysis information with the first evaluation specification information, the vulnerability analysis information indicating a result of analysis of the vulnerability of the information security of the evaluation target device; and a re-definer that generates and outputs second evaluation specification information by re-defining, based on the first association processing and the second association processing, the one or more evaluation specifications indicated by the first evaluation specification information.