Evaporative Emissions Valve Control for Engine Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling evaporative emissions in vehicles do not optimally balance carbon emission reduction with engine performance across various conditions.

Innovation Solution

An evaporative emissions system with sensors and processors that control valves between the fuel tank and carbon canister, determining appropriate purging conditions based on transmission state, fuel tank pressure, and diagnostics to manage carbon emissions effectively while maintaining engine performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If aggressive purging is used to reduce carbon emissions, then emission reduction is improved, but engine performance deteriorates due to potential stalling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the purging strategy by switching between aggressive and conservative modes based on real-time sensor data including engine RPM, vehicle speed, and transmission state. The control module modulates the purge valve opening percentage and duration to optimize the balance between emission reduction and engine performance maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from multiple sensors (oxygen sensors, manifold pressure sensors, engine RPM sensors) to continuously monitor engine performance and adjust purging rates accordingly. When engine performance degradation is detected, the system reduces purging intensity; when performance is stable, the system increases purging to reduce emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If conservative purging is used to maintain engine performance, then engine performance is maintained, but carbon emission reduction becomes less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine performanceVSAvoidcarbon emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic purging cycles alternating between aggressive and conservative modes. During periods when engine performance allows, aggressive purging is applied to maximize emission reduction. When performance constraints are detected, the system switches to conservative purging, creating a periodic pattern that achieves both goals over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If multiple valves and sensors are added to control purging, then emission control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurging control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control module serves multiple functions: it monitors engine performance parameters, determines purging strategy (aggressive or conservative), controls purge valve timing and duration, and adjusts purging rates in real-time. This multi-functional approach consolidates control logic into a single module, reducing overall system complexity despite multiple sensors and valves being present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system selectively controls carbon emissions by adjusting purging rates, ensuring efficient emission reduction while preventing engine stalling, thus optimizing both emission control and engine performance.

Implementation Method 1

a carbon canister configured to capture carbon emissions from the fuel tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS12092044B1Fuel tank isolation valve controls and diagnostics
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12092044B1 patent drawing
  • US12092044B1 patent drawing
  • US12092044B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for an evaporative emissions system of a vehicle. In an exemplary embodiment, the evaporative emissions system includes an engine; a fuel tank configured to provide fuel for the engine; a plurality of sensors configured to generate sensor data for the evaporative emissions system; a carbon canister configured to capture carbon emissions from the fuel tank; a first valve disposed between the carbon canister and the engine; a second valve disposed between the fuel tank and the carbon canister; and one or more processors that are configured to at least facilitate selectively controlling opening and closing of the first and second valves, to thereby control carbon emissions from the carbon canister and maintain performance of the engine, using the sensor data.