Evaporator Core Geometry for Heat Exchange and Flow Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional evaporators face challenges in maximizing heat exchange efficiency due to limitations in the dimensional extent of the communicating hole, number of holes, fin height, and tube height, leading to temperature deviations and restricted airflow or refrigerant flow.

Innovation Solution

The evaporator design optimizes the surface area of the communicating hole, number of holes, fin height, and tube height to create a dimensional extent that maximizes heat radiation and minimizes temperature deviations, with specific dimensions such as a 20-35 mm core width, 70-130% communicating hole area relative to the compartment area, 4-7 mm fin height, and 2-3 mm tube height, ensuring smooth flow of refrigerant and air.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the surface area of the communicating hole is increased, then the heat exchange efficiency is improved, but the temperature deviation on the evaporator surface increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoidsurface temperature uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific dimensional ratios: the communicating hole area is set at 70-130% of the compartment area, fin height at 4-7mm, and tube height at 2-3mm. These optimized parameters simultaneously improve heat exchange efficiency while controlling temperature deviation across the evaporator surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If the fin height is increased, then the heat exchange surface area is increased, but the external air flow is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange surface areaVSAvoidair flow speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by optimizing the fin height parameter to 4-7mm. This specific range maximizes the heat exchange surface area while maintaining adequate gaps for external air flow, preventing airflow restriction that would occur with taller fins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the tube height is increased, then the internal refrigerant flow is improved, but the heat exchange performance is deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigerant flow speedVSAvoidheat exchange performance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the tube height parameter to 2-3mm, which balances the internal refrigerant flow improvement with heat exchange performance. This specific height range allows smooth refrigerant flow while maintaining adequate external fin height for heat exchange, preventing the performance deterioration that would occur with taller tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Area of stationary object

If the core portion width is decreased, then the evaporator size is reduced, but the heat radiation amount is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporator sizeVSAvoidheat radiation amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the core portion width to 20-35mm, which is the optimal range that minimizes evaporator size while maintaining adequate heat radiation amount. This parameter optimization ensures compact dimensions without sacrificing heat exchange capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This optimized design enhances heat exchange efficiency by maximizing heat radiation and reducing temperature deviations, allowing for improved airflow and refrigerant flow, thereby stabilizing air-conditioning performance.

Implementation Method 1

the refrigerant is flowed through the header tank and the tube, and while external air is flowed along the fin interposed between the tubes, the heat exchange is occurred between the refrigerant and the external air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

air introduced by an air blower is cooled due to heat exchange while liquid heat exchange medium is changed into a gaseous state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

liquid heat exchange medium is changed into a gaseous state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

liquid heat exchange medium is changed into a gaseous state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS9127892B2Evaporator
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 HANON SYST CO LTD
  • US9127892B2 patent drawing
  • US9127892B2 patent drawing
  • US9127892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an evaporator, and more particularly, to an evaporator which can restrict a surface area of a communication hole with respect to a cross sectional area of a compartment and a surface area of a tube with respect to a surface area of a fin, thereby providing a dimensional extent for maximizing the heat exchange efficiency. Therefore, by optimizing a relation between the surface area of the communication portion and the surface area of the compartment of the first header tank and dimensions for each surface area and the heights of the tube and fin, the present invention provides a dimensional extent for maximizing the heat radiation amount, reducing the maximum temperature deviation of the core portion and allowing the refrigerant and air to be smoothly flowed, thereby maximizing the heat exchange efficiency.