Evaporator Defrost Timing Using Real-Time COP Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ice formation on evaporator coils in refrigerant circuits reduces the system's coefficient of performance (COP) and leads to inefficient operation when defrosting is not timed optimally.

Innovation Solution

A controller determines the optimal defrosting time for the evaporator based on real-time and average COP calculations, ambient conditions, and expansion valve opening percentage to maximize system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If defrosting is performed frequently to remove ice from the evaporator, then the heat transfer efficiency is improved, but the energy consumption increases due to repeated defrost cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the COP of the refrigerant circuit and uses this feedback to determine when defrosting should be initiated. The controller compares real-time COP against threshold values and adjusts the defrost timing accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes the balance between heat transfer efficiency and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the refrigerant circuit by initiating defrost cycles based on COP thresholds. During defrost mode, the refrigerant flow direction is reversed or bypassed, changing the thermal parameters of the evaporator from cooling to heating, thereby removing ice accumulation without excessive energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If defrosting is delayed to save energy, then the energy consumption is reduced, but the system performance deteriorates due to ice accumulation on the evaporator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous monitoring of COP provides real-time feedback on system performance degradation. When COP drops below a threshold indicating significant ice accumulation, the system automatically triggers a defrost cycle, ensuring system performance is maintained while avoiding unnecessary early defrosting that would waste energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of ice accumulation conditions by monitoring COP trends and environmental parameters before initiating defrosting. This allows the system to time the defrost action optimally - just when needed - rather than using fixed schedules, thereby balancing energy savings with performance maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the expansion valve opening percentage is increased to improve refrigerant flow, then the cooling capacity is enhanced, but the COP decreases when ice accumulates on the evaporator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidCOP
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors COP as an indicator of evaporator ice accumulation. When COP drops below thresholds that would result from ice formation, the controller initiates defrosting even if the expansion valve is open, preventing the scenario where increased valve opening cannot compensate for ice-blocked heat transfer surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures efficient defrosting at the right time, minimizing energy waste and maintaining high COP by optimizing defrost cycle initiation and duration.

Implementation Method 1

Ice accumulates or forms on the evaporator (e.g., on evaporator coils) when the refrigerant circuit operates in a moist environment... Ice works as an insulation layer between the air and the evaporator, and as such, reduces the heat flow from the air to the refrigerant included in the evaporator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

defrosting may be used to melt/remove the ice from the evaporator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS20260022876A1Systems and Methods to Defrost an Evaporator
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 RHEEM MFG CO
  • US20260022876A1 patent drawing
  • US20260022876A1 patent drawing
  • US20260022876A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including a refrigerant circuit, a sensor unit and a controller is disclosed. The sensor unit may be configured to measure one or more parameters associated with the system. The controller may be configured to determine a real-time coefficient of performance (COP) associated with the refrigerant circuit based on the parameters measured by the sensor unit. The controller may be further configured to determine that the real-time COP may be equivalent to or less than a threshold COP value. The controller may initiate a new defrost cycle of the refrigerant circuit responsive to determining that the real-time COP is equivalent to or less than the threshold COP value.