Evasion Trajectory Optimization Using Transverse-Dynamic Quality Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Average motor vehicle drivers often struggle with evading obstacles by inappropriate steering maneuvers, leading to collisions or instability, as existing safety systems either override driver control or lack optimization criteria for evasion trajectories.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining an optimized evasion trajectory for lane change and evasion assistance systems, using transverse-dynamic quality factors to calculate a trajectory that minimizes transverse acceleration and jerk, with adjustable weighting parameters based on friction and time to collision, allowing driver control while enhancing maneuver safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a safety system automatically establishes an evasion course and takes control away from the driver, then collision prevention is improved, but driver control and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoiddriver control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system acts as an intermediary by providing guidance signals (steering torques, haptic signals, or additional steering angles) rather than fully overriding driver control. The driver retains final authority to override the system, creating a collaborative relationship between human and machine that improves collision prevention while preserving driver control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If steering intervention is applied too late or too quickly, then response time is reduced, but maneuver stability and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidmaneuver stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evasion trajectory is dynamically optimized by adjusting weighting parameters in the quality factor function based on current driving conditions, including time to collision and road friction. This allows the system to adapt the timing and aggressiveness of steering interventions in real-time, achieving rapid response when necessary while maintaining maneuver stability through condition-appropriate parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If an optimized evasion trajectory is calculated using transverse-dynamic quality factors, then maneuver quality and reliability are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical trial-and-error approaches with a mathematical optimization model using transverse-dynamic quality factors. By formulating the evasion trajectory calculation as an optimization problem with defined objective functions and constraints, the system achieves high maneuver quality through computational algorithms rather than mechanical complexity, leveraging software-based solutions to reduce hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8918273B2Method for determining an evasion trajectory for a motor vehicle, and safety device or safety system
Publication Date: 2014.12.23 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US8918273B2 patent drawing
  • US8918273B2 patent drawing
  • US8918273B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determination of an optimized evasion trajectory by a safety device or a safety system, in particular a lane change assistance system and/or evasion assistance system, of a motor vehicle, the optimized evasion trajectory being outputted to a vehicle driver, and/or a trajectory of the motor vehicle being optionally partially adapted to the optimized evasion trajectory, by way of the method, the optimized evasion trajectory being determined by optimization of a transverse-dynamic quality factor (J), for which a transverse acceleration (a) and/or a transverse jerk ({dot over (a)}) of the motor vehicle is/are utilized. Also described is a safety device or a safety system, in particular to a lane change assistance system and/or an evasion assistance system for a motor vehicle, a method being executable and/or being executed by the safety device or the safety system.