Event-Activated Error Resolution for Medical Billing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical systems face significant revenue losses due to errors in data entry and billing processes, leading to delayed or unpaid invoices, which are inefficiently resolved through manual human intervention, requiring extensive resources and time.

Innovation Solution

An event-activated dynamic evolutionary algorithm that identifies and corrects errors across multiple accounts by activating a controller process, creating agents to implement instructional sets, and generating reports to resolve errors, thereby reducing the need for manual intervention and increasing revenue collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual human intervention is used to resolve errors in medical billing accounts, then errors can be corrected, but the process is inefficient, error-prone, and requires extensive full-time resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction accuracyVSAvoiderror resolution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated error detection and resolution mechanisms. The computer system automatically identifies errors in medical billing accounts, determines appropriate corrections based on predefined rules, and applies fixes without requiring manual human intervention for each error, thereby improving efficiency while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual process of error correction with an automated computer-based system. The system uses electronic algorithms to detect, analyze, and resolve errors in medical billing accounts, substituting human manual operations with automated computational processes that are both faster and more reliable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If more manpower and time are allocated to manually fix errors in medical accounts, then error resolution completeness improves, but the time-consuming process leads to further delays in payment collection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror resolution completenessVSAvoidpayment collection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary error detection and resolution actions automatically as part of the billing process. By identifying and correcting errors before invoice submission, the system prevents payment delays without requiring additional time for post-error correction, thus maintaining completeness while reducing time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated error resolution system operates continuously and concurrently with other billing processes. Multiple errors across multiple accounts are resolved simultaneously through continuous automated operations, rather than sequentially through manual processes, thereby maintaining high completion rates while minimizing payment collection delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If the medical system processes a high volume of accounts quickly to meet payment deadlines, then productivity increases, but errors in data entry and billing occur more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount processing speedVSAvoiddata entry accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor processed accounts for errors. When errors are detected, the system automatically triggers correction processes, creating a closed-loop system that maintains high processing speeds while ensuring data accuracy through real-time verification and correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual data entry and verification processes with automated computer-based systems. The automated system processes accounts faster while simultaneously performing error detection and correction, eliminating the inverse relationship between processing speed and accuracy that characterizes manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If multiple coding systems are used for medical billing to ensure comprehensive coverage, then billing completeness improves, but the complexity of the system increases, leading to more errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling completenessVSAvoidcoding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated error resolution system is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple coding systems simultaneously. The system can detect and resolve errors across different medical coding standards (such as ICD-10, CPT, HCPCS) using a unified automated platform, thereby maintaining billing completeness across diverse coding requirements without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated error detection and resolution layer that acts as an intermediary between multiple coding systems and the billing process. This intermediary layer standardizes error handling across different coding systems, managing complexity centrally while allowing individual coding systems to maintain their specific requirements for billing completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11385953B2Event activated error resolution
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US11385953B2 patent drawing
  • US11385953B2 patent drawing
  • US11385953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computerized systems and methods are provided to intelligently and dynamically monitor at least one account using an evolutionary algorithm to identify and resolve errors. After receiving one or more indications to initiate a controller process as a result of identifying one or more errors within one or more accounts, the controller process is activated. A local cloud controller determines whether the one or more errors are located on a job list that includes a plurality of errors and instruction sets to resolve each of the plurality of errors. Then, the local cloud controller creates one or more agents to implement the instruction sets on the one or more errors to resolve them. Following this, one or more reports are generated that include the status of the one or more errors after the instruction sets have been implemented.