Domain QA Retrieval Using Event-Aware Document Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document question answering systems struggle with low accuracy in retrieving relevant documents and generating accurate answers due to insufficient utilization of semantic vectors, event categories, and argument information in specific fields.

Innovation Solution

An answer information generation method using a large language model that involves obtaining semantic vectors and event information from user questions, retrieving candidate documents based on semantic vectors and event categories, determining quality evaluation information, and selecting target documents based on correlation and quality scores to enhance document recall accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional document retrieval methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the accuracy of retrieving relevant documents is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument retrieval accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms traditional single-dimension keyword matching into multi-dimensional retrieval by introducing semantic vectors, event categories, and argument information as additional dimensions. This allows documents to be retrieved based on multiple features simultaneously, significantly improving retrieval accuracy while managing complexity through structured processing of each dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the document retrieval process into distinct components: semantic vector extraction, event category identification, argument information extraction, and quality evaluation. Each component handles a specific aspect of the retrieval task, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design while achieving high accuracy through coordinated operation of all segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple retrieval criteria are used to improve document quality, then the relevance of retrieved documents improves, but the complexity of the retrieval process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument relevanceVSAvoidretrieval process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-extracting semantic vectors, event categories, and argument information from both query and document texts before the actual retrieval matching process. This preparation work is done in advance, allowing the retrieval system to focus on comparing pre-computed features rather than processing raw text during retrieval, thus improving relevance while managing complexity through staged processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for document evaluation by introducing quality evaluation information that combines multiple criteria (semantic similarity, event category matching, argument information alignment). This multi-parameter approach improves document relevance selection while the systematic way of combining parameters keeps the process manageable through weighted scoring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If event information and argument information are extracted and utilized, then the precision of answer generation improves, but the processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer generation precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts event information and argument information in advance during the document retrieval phase, so that when answer generation occurs, these structured elements are already available for immediate use. This preliminary extraction improves answer precision by providing contextual frameworks while reducing processing time during the actual answer generation stage since the work is already done.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250371046A1Answer information generation method
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 BEIJING BAIDU NETCOM SCI & TECH CO LTD
  • US20250371046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371046A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided. The method includes: obtaining, in response to receiving a question text from a user, a semantic vector of the question text and event information related to a specific field; obtaining a plurality of candidate documents from a document library of the specific field based on at least two of the semantic vector of the question text, the at least one piece of argument information and the event category; determining quality evaluation information for each candidate document in the plurality of candidate documents based on the event category; and determining at least one target document from the plurality of candidate documents based on the quality evaluation information of each candidate document and a correlation between each candidate document and the question text, to obtain, based on the at least one target document, answer information used to answer the question text.