Event-Based Node Coordination Without Centralized Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed networks face challenges in coordinating autonomous machines without centralised systems, particularly in environments where centralised communication is unreliable or unavailable, leading to synchronization errors and limited contextual information exchange that can result in safety risks and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method for coordinating machines in a distributed network using event-based synchronization, where nodes construct a logical dependency tree and communicate state information to ensure tasks are completed safely and efficiently without relying on an absolute timestamp.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralised network connections are used to coordinate autonomous devices, then coordination reliability is improved, but deployment flexibility and adaptability to remote locations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination reliabilityVSAvoiddeployment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized coordination system into distributed autonomous nodes that each independently execute tasks and make decisions. Instead of one central coordinator, multiple nodes segment the coordination function across the network, allowing deployment in remote locations without centralized infrastructure while maintaining reliable coordination through peer-to-peer communication and consensus mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the coordination function from a centralized server and embeds it directly into autonomous nodes. Each node takes out the ability to independently determine task execution, select actions, and coordinate with others, removing the dependency on centralized network connections and enabling deployment in environments where centralised infrastructure is unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If distributed networks are used without central coordination, then deployment flexibility is improved, but synchronization precision deteriorates due to lack of global clock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoidsynchronization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism in the form of event-based messaging and logical timestamps that mediate between distributed nodes' local clocks. Instead of relying on a global clock, nodes use event-driven communication with structured messages containing logical time references, allowing synchronization without precise time alignment while maintaining deployment flexibility in distributed environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the time synchronization parameter from absolute timestamp-based synchronization to event-based logical time. By transforming the synchronization mechanism from relying on precise clock alignment to using event sequencing and logical timestamps, the system achieves both deployment flexibility and adequate synchronization precision for task coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If contextual information is increased in message exchanges, then decision-making quality is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual information completenessVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making contextual information exchange selective and targeted. Instead of all nodes exchanging all possible information, each node exchanges only the contextual information relevant to its local decision-making needs and task coordination requirements. This reduces overall bandwidth consumption while maintaining sufficient information quality for autonomous decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by exchanging only the necessary portion of contextual information required for task coordination and safety-critical decisions. Nodes transmit selective contextual data rather than complete state information, achieving adequate decision-making quality with reduced bandwidth consumption by transmitting only what is partially sufficient for the coordination task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12604286B2Distributed event-based coordination model
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 PHINXT ROBOTICS LTD
  • US12604286B2 patent drawing
  • US12604286B2 patent drawing
  • US12604286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to coordinating tasks in a distributed mesh of systems, such as between autonomous vehicles, multi-camera systems, IoT distributed node systems and/or modular factories in a variety of use cases. More particularly, the present invention relates to coordinating events in a distributed mesh of systems based on parameters and constraints and can be used to provide a messaging arrangement that allows distributed systems to communicate and ensure that tasks are completed within the distributed system and/or at one or more nodes within the distributed system. Aspects and/or embodiments seek to provide a method for coordinating machines/nodes/devices of a distributed network, without a centralised system component, by synchronising devices of a distributed system without using an absolute timestamp. Instead, a logical, event-based dependency tree is collaboratively constructed by the nodes of a distributed network to manage decisions at each node of a distributed network.