Event Confirmation System for Inventory Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In materials handling facilities, accurately determining user actions and item identities in real-time is challenging due to uncertainties in image processing and sensor data, leading to potential errors in inventory management and user confirmation processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize image capture devices, sensors, and portable devices to detect events, identify users and items, and generate user interfaces for confirmation, ensuring high confidence scores in determining user actions and item identities, with requests for user verification when confidence is low.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If image processing and sensor data are used to determine user actions and item identities, then automation and productivity are improved, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to uncertainties in data interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time event detection speedVSAvoiduser action and item identity determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system presents determined events to users for confirmation through user interface elements. User confirmations serve as feedback to verify or correct automated determinations, improving reliability while maintaining automated processing speed. The system continuously refines its determinations based on this feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A confidence score mechanism acts as an intermediary between automated detection and final determination. When confidence scores fall below thresholds, the system requests user verification, bridging the gap between automated efficiency and human accuracy without requiring constant manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If user confirmation requests are implemented for low confidence determinations, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent determination accuracyVSAvoiduser verification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies user verification selectively only when confidence scores fall below predetermined thresholds, rather than requiring confirmation for all events. This partial application of verification maintains reliability for uncertain determinations while avoiding time loss for high-confidence automated detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the threshold for requesting user confirmation based on confidence scores. By changing this parameter, the system optimizes the balance between reliability and time loss, requesting verification only when statistically necessary rather than using a fixed approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple data sources and processing algorithms are used, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a unified confidence scoring mechanism that works across multiple data sources and detection algorithms. This universal approach consolidates complexity into a single evaluation framework rather than requiring separate processing paths for each data source, managing system complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12020304B1Item and action determination
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12020304B1 patent drawing
  • US12020304B1 patent drawing
  • US12020304B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system and method for presenting event information to a user and, if necessary, obtaining confirmation of different aspects (user, item, action) of the event. In some implementations, an event includes a user, an action, and an item. For example, an event may include a user picking an item from an inventory location, a user placing an item into a tote associated with the user, etc. if the aspects of the event cannot be determined with a high enough degree of confidence, a user interface may be generated and sent to the user requesting confirmation of one or more of the aspects of the event.