Event-Controlled View Selection for Multi-Bay Imaging Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The multitasking environment for remote experts assisting multiple imaging bays is taxing, requiring efficient event prioritization and view selection to provide effective assistance to local operators.

Innovation Solution

A system with a feed aggregator and event prioritization mapping identifies the highest priority event and corresponding UI view, presenting information from the workspace of the local operator in need of assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the remote expert manually monitors multiple imaging bays simultaneously, then comprehensive oversight is achieved, but the expert's cognitive load and workload increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoversight qualityVSAvoidexpert workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically detecting events, prioritizing them, and switching views without requiring manual expert intervention. The automated event detection and prioritization system serves itself by monitoring multiple bays and managing the expert's attention, thereby reducing cognitive load while maintaining comprehensive oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring imaging bay events and dynamically adjusting the displayed view based on event priority. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the expert receives relevant information automatically, maintaining oversight quality without increasing workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed views of all imaging bays simultaneously, then complete information availability is achieved, but information overload occurs making it difficult to identify critical events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidUI complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing detailed information only for the currently active imaging bay view, while other bays are shown in summary form. This selective detail provision ensures complete information availability for critical events while avoiding UI complexity and information overload by limiting detailed display to one bay at a time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments information display into hierarchical levels: summary views for multiple bays and detailed views for the active bay. This segmentation allows complete information to be available in the detailed view while the summary view provides overview, thereby managing UI complexity and preventing information overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the remote expert switches between multiple imaging bays manually, then all bays receive attention, but response time to critical events increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent response reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-prioritizing events and pre-selecting the most critical imaging bay for display before the expert needs to respond. This advance preparation ensures that when the expert looks at the screen, the most critical event is already prominently displayed, thereby improving response reliability and reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by automatically switching between imaging bay views based on real-time event priority. This dynamic view switching ensures that the expert's attention is automatically directed to critical events as they occur, improving response reliability and reducing response time compared to static or manual switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system displays all available views and information, then comprehensive monitoring capability is achieved, but the interface becomes complex and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring capabilityVSAvoidinterface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a single automated view switching mechanism that handles multiple imaging bays, event types, and priority levels. This multi-functional approach provides comprehensive monitoring capability through one unified interface rather than requiring separate controls for each bay or event type, thereby maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface applies self-service by automatically managing view switching and information prioritization without requiring expert navigation or configuration. This automated interface management provides comprehensive monitoring capability while maintaining simplicity and ease of operation, as the system serves itself by adapting the display to event priorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12374111B2Event-controlled view selection
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12374111B2 patent drawing
  • US12374111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (100) of controlling a user interface (UI) provided by a remote operator workstation of a remote expert (RE) providing assistance to local operators (LO) of respective medical imaging devices (2) during a medical imaging examination includes: analyzing signal feeds (17, 18, 9) received by a feed aggregator (15) to detect events occurring in workspaces of the local operators; identifying a highest priority event from amongst the detected events using an event prioritization mapping; identifying a highest priority local operator as the local operator in whose workspace the highest priority event occurred; selecting a highest priority UI view corresponding to the highest priority event using the event-to-UI view mapping; and presenting information derived from the signal feeds from the workspace of the highest priority local operator in accordance with the highest priority UI view.