Event Counter Memory Cell Segmentation and Self-Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional event counters face issues with cell wear and defects, leading to the need for redundancy cells, which increase counter updating time and memory size, and are vulnerable to fraudulent attacks that can incorrectly identify functional cells as defective.

Innovation Solution

The method involves dividing memory cells into words of identical sizes, where values outside a specified range are adjusted to maintain a fixed interval, allowing for arithmetic summation to provide the counter value, and enabling self-compensation of defective cells by valid ones, reducing the reliance on redundancy cells and improving fraud detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If redundancy cells are used to replace defective cells, then reliability is improved, but counter updating time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter reliabilityVSAvoidcounter updating time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by periodically testing memory cells and identifying defective ones before they cause counter updates to fail. The system proactively replaces defective cells with redundant ones in advance, ensuring reliability without delaying actual counter updates during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the counter into multiple independent sections, each with its own redundant cells. This allows the counter to continue updating other sections while one section is being repaired or replaced, thereby maintaining overall counter updating speed while improving reliability through localized redundancy management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If redundancy cells are provided to replace defective cells, then reliability is improved, but memory size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter reliabilityVSAvoidmemory size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes redundancy cells universal by designing them to be interchangeable with any defective cell in the counter. The same pool of redundant cells can replace defective cells in any position, and the addressing logic dynamically routes operations to appropriate cells. This multi-functional design allows a smaller number of redundant cells to provide coverage for the entire counter, reducing the overall memory size requirement compared to dedicated redundancy for each cell.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If all memory plane cells are periodically tested to detect defective cells, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefective cell detection accuracyVSAvoidcounter update speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic testing of memory cells at scheduled intervals rather than continuously or before every counter update. This periodic action allows the system to maintain high productivity during normal operation while still detecting defective cells regularly enough to ensure reliability. The testing frequency is optimized to balance detection accuracy with operational throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs cell testing as a preliminary action during idle periods or between counter update operations. By scheduling tests in advance during low-utilization periods, the system maintains high counter update speed during active operations while still achieving comprehensive cell detection through periodic preliminary testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If conventional counter updating methods are used, then counter accuracy is maintained, but the counter is vulnerable to fraudulent attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter accuracyVSAvoidfraud vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor counter update operations and cell status in real-time. When a fraudulent attack is detected or a cell becomes defective, the system receives feedback and automatically adjusts by routing operations through redundant cells or correcting the counter state, thereby maintaining accuracy while defending against fraud without compromising the precision of legitimate counting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8122079B2Event counter
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 STMICROELECTRONICS BELGIUM
  • US8122079B2 patent drawing
  • US8122079B2 patent drawing
  • US8122079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A counting method and a counter using an integrated circuit memory area, including at least one step of storage of partial values in several words of identical memory sizes, the result of the counting being obtained by arithmetically adding the values contained in the different words.