Event Driven Option Valuation Using Jump Diffusion Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for valuing event-driven option contracts are inefficient, particularly when the contracts are complex or the underlying financial instruments' values change frequently, as they require excessive processing and degrade in performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a jump diffusion model based on the Merton jump diffusion model with arithmetic movement assumptions, using a Bachelier-based arithmetic model to calculate event-driven option contract values, which can be partially or wholly implemented on a computer-readable medium for efficient valuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simulation models are used to value event driven option contracts, then valuation accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational requirements increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the valuation process by separating the event-driven component from the underlying asset pricing. It uses a closed-form solution for the event-driven payoff (binary or linear) combined with a separate model for the underlying asset (Heston, SABR, etc.), allowing each component to be valued independently and efficiently without requiring full simulation of complex interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical simulation-based valuation system with an analytical/closed-form mathematical system. Instead of using Monte Carlo simulations or finite difference methods that require extensive computation, it derives closed-form solutions that provide accurate valuations through direct mathematical calculations, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If analytical models are used to value complex event driven option contracts, then processing speed is improved, but valuation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidvaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameterization approach by allowing flexible specification of underlying asset dynamics (Heston stochastic volatility, SABR interest rate models, etc.) and event specifications (binary events, continuous ranges, multiple events). This parameter flexibility enables the closed-form solution to adapt to complex contract structures while maintaining computational efficiency through the analytical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If simulation models are used when underlying financial instrument values change frequently, then valuation accuracy is improved, but practicality and processing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation accuracyVSAvoidpracticality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous valuation by providing a closed-form solution that can be rapidly recalculated as underlying asset prices and volatility parameters change. The analytical framework allows real-time or near-real-time valuation updates without the computational burden of re-running simulations, making it practical for frequent price changes and dynamic trading environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8036972B2Option pricing model for event driven instruments
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC
  • US8036972B2 patent drawing
  • US8036972B2 patent drawing
  • US8036972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for valuing event driven option contracts. A jump diffusion based model, such as a Merton jump diffusion based model, is modified to assume arithmetic movement of an underlying price and a single jump. The arithmetic movement of the underlying price may be modeled with a Bachelier based arithmetic model. Calculated values may be used to determine margin account requirements.