Event-Driven Order Routing Across Trading Venues With Low Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic trading systems face challenges in managing high-frequency trading across multiple venues with low latency, regulatory compliance, and adapting to evolving market structures, requiring improved infrastructure for efficient data processing, order routing, and risk management.

Innovation Solution

A networked system that stores event response pairs with predicates and underlying orders, processes continuous trigger information entries, and employs a multi-response handling algorithm to sequence and prioritize order transmissions across distributed trading environments, while generating unified market data messages for comprehensive audit trails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple data feeds and trading venues are monitored simultaneously, then trading opportunities are increased, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading opportunitiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex monitoring task into modular event response pairs, where each pair independently handles a specific trading venue or data feed. This allows the system to scale by adding individual segments without redesigning the entire system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The event response pair structure serves multiple functions: it monitors market data, evaluates trading signals, routes orders to appropriate venues, and maintains audit trails. This multi-functional design reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If real-time processing of large volumes of market data is implemented, then trading speed is improved, but processing latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading speedVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Event response pairs are pre-configured with evaluation logic and routing instructions before market data arrives. When data is received, the system simply matches it against pre-defined predicates rather than performing complex analysis in real-time, significantly reducing processing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs event-driven architecture where market data automatically triggers pre-configured response pairs without requiring active polling or complex query processing. This self-service mechanism minimizes processing overhead and maintains low latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If comprehensive audit trails and market data management are implemented, then regulatory compliance is improved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential compliance-related information from comprehensive market data into structured audit trail records. By taking out only the necessary elements (order lifecycle events, market conditions at trade time) rather than storing all raw data, the system maintains compliance while reducing storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If automated trading strategies are implemented across multiple venues, then trading efficiency is improved, but order routing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading efficiencyVSAvoidorder routing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each event response pair contains venue-specific routing logic and parameters tailored to the destination exchange's requirements. This local customization allows efficient automated trading across multiple venues without requiring a single complex universal routing system, as each route is optimized independently for its target venue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260057440A1Networked event response system
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 PAX MARKETS INC
  • US20260057440A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057440A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057440A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A networked system for processing event response pairs across multiple locations includes a memory storing a plurality of event response pairs, each comprising an event predicate and an associated underlying order; a network interface receiving a continuous stream of trigger information entries from internal and external sources; and a processor coupled to the memory and network interface. The processor evaluates each received trigger information entry against the stored event predicates to identify one or more matches, prepares the associated underlying orders for transmission to specified destinations, sequences the prepared underlying orders based on a multi-response handling algorithm, and transmits the sequenced underlying orders via the network interface to the specified destinations.