Event Horizon Forecasting With Condition-Specific ML Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rule-based alerting systems in complex systems, such as power plants and industrial machines, struggle to accurately predict equipment failures and consumable exhaustion, often resulting in false-positive alerts and inadequate early warning times for maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based approach that aggregates signal data from sensors into feature vectors, generates label data, and trains separate models for distinct conditions to predict event horizons, providing more accurate and reliable forecasts for timely interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If rule-based alerting systems are used to predict equipment failures, then the system complexity is low and ease of operation is maintained, but prediction accuracy deteriorates and false-positive alerts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction system into multiple specialized machine learning models, each trained on specific feature vectors derived from different sensor data sources. This segmentation allows each model to focus on particular failure modes or equipment types, improving prediction accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning algorithms as intermediary components between raw sensor data and failure predictions. These ML models act as mediators that transform complex sensor signals into meaningful predictive insights, bridging the gap between simple rule-based systems and the need for accurate predictions without requiring direct complex rule formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If rule-based alerting systems are used, then the system is easy to operate, but early warning time is insufficient and alert fatigue occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveearly warning timeVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by training machine learning models on historical sensor data and failure patterns before deployment. This pre-training phase allows the system to learn from past failures and establish predictive capabilities in advance, enabling earlier and more accurate warnings without requiring complex real-time rule formulations during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where prediction outcomes and actual failure data are fed back into the machine learning models for continuous improvement. This feedback loop enables the system to refine its predictions over time, reducing false positives and alert fatigue while maintaining ease of operation through automated model retraining and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If machine learning models are trained on all conditions together, then the system is simpler to implement, but prediction reliability for distinct conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into distinct condition-specific datasets, where separate machine learning models are trained on feature vectors corresponding to different operational conditions, equipment types, or failure modes. This segmentation improves prediction reliability for each specific condition by allowing models to specialize, while the modular approach keeps implementation complexity manageable through systematic training procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11480956B2Computing an explainable event horizon estimate
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 FALKONRY INC
  • US11480956B2 patent drawing
  • US11480956B2 patent drawing
  • US11480956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating forecast predictions that indicate an event horizon of an entity or remaining useful life of a consumable using machine learning techniques is provided. Using a server computer system, feature data comprising features vectors that represent a set of signal data over a range of time is stored. Condition data comprising conditions occurring on the entity at particular moments in time is stored. Label data that comprises a plurality of time values that each indicate a difference in time between one condition and another condition is stored. A training dataset is created by combining the feature data, the condition data, and the label data into a single dataset. The training dataset is partitioned by condition. A machine learning model is trained on each target condition training dataset. The trained machine learning models are used to generate forecast values that each indicate an amount of time to an occurrence of a target condition associated with an entity.