Event Planning System Task Customization and Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing event planning systems lack flexibility in generating comprehensive plans and fail to effectively translate user intentions into customized event plans, relying on pre-packaged task lists that do not accommodate individual preferences.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows users to input search queries for events, returning a list of potential tasks which can be selected and edited to create a customized plan, integrating task management, vendor package selection, and scheduling with reminders and alerts across multiple devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pre-packaged task lists are used, then the planning process is simplified, but the system lacks flexibility and cannot accommodate individual preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning process simplicityVSAvoidcustomization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to dynamically modify task lists by adding, removing, or reordering tasks based on their specific event requirements. The task management interface enables real-time adjustments to the plan structure, transforming static pre-packaged lists into dynamic customized plans that adapt to individual preferences and event characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The planning system divides the event preparation process into discrete, manageable tasks that can be independently selected, modified, or removed. This segmentation allows users to build customized plans by combining different task modules in various configurations, maintaining simplicity while enabling flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive task lists are generated, then the planning coverage is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies and presents relevant tasks based on the event type and user input before the planning process begins. This preliminary action filters and organizes potential tasks in advance, reducing the complexity of generating comprehensive plans while ensuring adequate coverage of essential event preparation areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The task management system serves multiple functions including task generation, customization, scheduling, and progress tracking within a unified interface. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate tools and processes into a single comprehensive platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated task generation is used, then the planning speed is improved, but the customization quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning speedVSAvoidcustomization quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated task generation as a preliminary step to create a baseline plan quickly, then provides intuitive editing capabilities that allow users to easily customize the automated content. This two-stage approach maintains high planning speed while ensuring customization quality through user-controlled modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users can review and modify automatically generated tasks, and these modifications are saved as part of the customized plan. This feedback loop ensures that automated generation serves as a starting point rather than the final product, maintaining both speed and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9064015B2Action alignment for event planning, project management and process structuring
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 ARTIST GROWTH LLC
  • US9064015B2 patent drawing
  • US9064015B2 patent drawing
  • US9064015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An action alignment system for event planning and execution searches out web sites relating to event planning and, based on web site content, constructs a database of various tasks that might be desired for different events (tasks can also be manually added to the database). The tasks have associated tags which allow a task search engine to match a user query representing a proposed event to potential tasks. This list of potential tasks is presented to the user who may then select the tasks as desired to customize the event plan. Vendors can provide pre-packaged deals for the tasks, and this information can be included with the task database, selected by the user, and added to the event plan. A scheduler and alert engine then inserts appropriate entries into the user's calendar, and sends timely alerts to the user which include links that simplify event management.