Event Recording System with Automatic Annotation Indexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inefficient information dissemination and collaboration during meetings, where not all participants can attend or receive updates, leading to inefficiencies and lack of access to the latest developments.

Innovation Solution

A system for recording and annotating events, allowing automatic annotation based on indicators like keywords, hand gestures, and body language, enabling users to review and contribute comments, questions, and corrections, with features for indexing and searching, facilitating efficient access to important sections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If meeting recordings are made available for review, then information access for absent participants is improved, but time required to review entire meetings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts key information from meeting recordings by automatically generating transcripts and identifying important sections based on speech patterns, keywords, and user annotations. This extraction process creates condensed summaries that preserve essential information while eliminating unnecessary content, allowing users to access meeting information without reviewing entire recordings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple representations of meeting content including full recordings, transcripts, annotated versions, and summaries. Users can access different copies depending on their needs - full recordings for complete information, transcripts for text-based review, annotated versions for highlighted key points, or summaries for quick overviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If automatic annotation based on indicators is implemented, then identification of important sections is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesection identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of meeting recordings during or immediately after the meeting, generating transcripts and basic annotations in advance. This preliminary action prepares the data for faster subsequent retrieval and annotation, reducing the computational burden during user review sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs transcription, speaker identification, and initial annotation without requiring manual intervention. Users can then build upon this automatically generated content by adding their own annotations and comments, creating a collaborative annotation process that reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple users can annotate and comment on recordings, then collaboration and information sharing are improved, but coordination and distribution management becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal annotation platform that works across different users, devices, and meeting types. The same interface and processes are used whether one user or multiple users are annotating, whether it's a formal business meeting or informal discussion, reducing the need for specialized coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms where users can see annotations and comments from other users as they are added. This immediate feedback allows users to coordinate their annotation efforts, avoid duplicate work, and build upon each other's contributions without requiring explicit communication or coordination protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8892553B2Auto-generation of events with annotation and indexing
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8892553B2 patent drawing
  • US8892553B2 patent drawing
  • US8892553B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Recording of various events in a video format that facilitates viewing and selective editing are provided. The video can be presented in a wiki-format that allows a multitude of subsequent users to add, modify and/or delete content to the original recorded event or a revision of that event. As edits and annotations are applied, either automatically or manually, such edits can be indexed based on criteria such as identification of an annotator, a time stamp associated with the edit, a revision number, or combinations thereof. The edits or annotations can be provided in various formats including video, audio, text, and so forth.