Event Summary Service for Information Filtering and Source Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in identifying and distinguishing important, factually correct information from diverse and potentially false news sources regarding events, as different news stories provide varying information.

Innovation Solution

A method for managing and providing event summaries involves a summary service that identifies events, suggests summary types based on user preferences and data analysis, and prioritizes summary types to enhance information retrieval, utilizing machine learning to tailor summaries to user interests and preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple news sources are used to provide information about events, then the quantity and diversity of information increases, but the difficulty of identifying important and factually correct information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of informationVSAvoiddifficulty of identifying important information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (the service system) that acts as a mediator between multiple news sources and users. This system aggregates information from multiple sources, analyzes credibility, identifies key facts, and presents synthesized summaries. The intermediary resolves the contradiction by filtering and organizing the diverse information stream, making it easier for users to identify important and accurate information without being overwhelmed by the quantity of sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user interactions (such as marking information as useful or incorrect) are used to refine and improve the information aggregation and presentation. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user behavior and continuously improve its ability to identify and present important, factually correct information, thereby reducing the difficulty of information identification while maintaining diverse source coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If different news stories provide varying information about the same event, then the completeness of information coverage increases, but the reliability of information decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of information coverageVSAvoidreliability of information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges information from multiple news sources by aggregating data, comparing facts, and synthesizing a unified view of each event. The system combines coverage from different sources to achieve comprehensive information coverage while simultaneously evaluating the reliability of each source and cross-validating facts. This merging process allows the system to present complete information coverage with enhanced reliability through multi-source verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it aggregates information from diverse sources, evaluates source credibility, identifies consistent facts across sources, presents synthesized summaries, and provides transparency about information sources. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve both complete information coverage and high reliability by integrating various information processing capabilities into a single unified service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If users manually review multiple news sources to identify important information, then the accuracy of information selection improves, but the time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of information selectionVSAvoidtime required for information review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-aggregating, analyzing, and organizing information from multiple news sources before users need it. It pre-identifies important information, evaluates source credibility, and prepares synthesized summaries in advance. This preliminary processing eliminates the need for users to manually review multiple sources, providing accurate information selection instantly without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically executing the information analysis and selection tasks that would otherwise require manual user review. It autonomously aggregates data, identifies key facts, evaluates reliability, and presents curated information without user intervention. This automation maintains high accuracy in information selection while eliminating the time investment users would otherwise need to make.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11640419B2Management of event summary types
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 PRIMER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11640419B2 patent drawing
  • US11640419B2 patent drawing
  • US11640419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and software described herein provide enhancements of managing summaries provided to end users. In one implementation, a summary service provides a user with identifier for a plurality of events, and obtains a selection from the user, wherein the selection identifies a first type of summary for an event in the plurality of events. The summary service further provides the user with a first summary of the first type for the event, identifies one or more suggested types of summaries for the event based at least in part on data points for the event, and provides the one or more suggested types of summaries to the user.