Event-Triggered Multiagent Control for Low-Exchange Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing distributed control architectures in multiagent systems suffer from excessive agent-to-agent information exchange, leading to network overload and high energy consumption, particularly in decentralized systems where global information exchange is less desirable due to security and scalability issues.

Innovation Solution

Implement a norm-free and adaptive event-triggering rule based on a solution-predictor curve method, allowing agents to estimate unknown variables and reduce information exchange by storing and exchanging parameters only when necessary, using a decentralized and adaptive event-triggering mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous or periodic information exchange is implemented in distributed control architectures, then system stability and coordination are maintained, but network overload and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements event-triggered control where information exchange occurs periodically only when specific triggering conditions are met, rather than continuously or at fixed intervals. This reduces communication frequency and energy consumption while maintaining system stability through conditional updates based on state changes and performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where agents monitor system states and trigger information exchange only when performance thresholds are violated or significant state changes occur. This feedback-driven approach ensures system stability is maintained while minimizing unnecessary communications and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If decentralized control architecture is used in multiagent systems, then scalability and security are improved, but information exchange efficiency deteriorates due to lack of global coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidinformation exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the multiagent system into independent decentralized agents that operate autonomously with local decision-making capabilities. Each agent segments the control function and exchanges information only with necessary neighbors, improving scalability while maintaining efficient localized information exchange without requiring global coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If norm-based event-triggering rules are implemented, then information exchange is reduced, but system complexity increases due to norm calculation and verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex norm calculation and verification steps from the event-triggering mechanism. Instead of calculating full state norms, the system uses simplified triggering conditions based on local state changes and performance thresholds, reducing energy consumption while maintaining low system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12568349B2Norm-free event triggered information exchange for distributed control of multiagent systems
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
  • US12568349B2 patent drawing
  • US12568349B2 patent drawing
  • US12568349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for information exchange of a vehicle in a multiagent system are disclosed. The methods and systems include: receiving one or more neighboring states broadcast by one or more neighboring vehicles; transmitting a last broadcast state of the vehicle to the one or more neighboring vehicles; determining a current state of the vehicle based on the one or more neighboring states and the last broadcast state; determining a norm-free information exchange triggering condition based on the last broadcast state, the current state, and an estimated command; and in response to the current state violating the norm-free information exchange triggering condition, transmitting the current state to the one or more neighboring vehicles. Other aspects, embodiments, and features are also claimed and described.