Evidence Tracking System Using Handheld Scanners and Centralized Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current evidence management systems in forensic investigations lack integration between central repositories and mobile scanners, leading to fragmented data entry and limited searching capabilities, particularly for vital statistics and descriptive information related to suspects, victims, and physical evidence, which can result in errors and inaccuracies in the chain of custody.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a handheld device with a camera and memory, evidence tags with machine-readable indicia, and a central server computer for tracking evidence, allowing for electronic monitoring and storage of investigatory materials, including the ability to attach and link photographs, descriptions, and location references, enabling comprehensive and accurate tracking of evidence throughout the investigation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual data entry and paper-based evidence tracking are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability of evidence tracking deteriorate due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual paper-based evidence tracking with an automated electronic system using mobile scanners, barcodes, and centralized databases. This substitution eliminates human error in data entry while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized interfaces and workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates electronic copies of evidence information through digital imaging and database records. Multiple copies can be stored and accessed simultaneously without risking loss or degradation, improving reliability while keeping the physical evidence intact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If centralized evidence repository is implemented, then information availability improves, but device complexity and integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accessibilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized repository is segmented into modular functional components including evidence intake, storage, tracking, and retrieval modules. Each module operates independently but communicates through standardized interfaces, reducing integration complexity while maintaining centralized data availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a centralized database as an intermediary layer between mobile scanners and evidence storage. This mediator standardizes data exchange formats and protocols, simplifying integration while ensuring universal access to evidence information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If mobile scanners with camera and memory are used, then measurement precision of evidence documentation improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence documentation accuracyVSAvoidhandheld device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile scanner is designed as a multi-functional device combining barcode scanning, digital imaging, text input, and wireless communication capabilities. This universality consolidates multiple separate tools into one device, improving documentation precision without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges previously separate functions (paper documentation, photography, data entry, and evidence tagging) into a single integrated mobile scanning system. This consolidation improves precision by ensuring all evidence attributes are captured simultaneously and consistently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If comprehensive searching capabilities are added, then productivity of evidence retrieval improves, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidsearch system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary organization and indexing of evidence data during the intake process. Evidence is pre-tagged with metadata, categories, and search keywords, enabling rapid retrieval without requiring complex search algorithms to process unstructured data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual evidence retrieval processes are replaced with automated database searching and filtering systems. The computer automatically queries and retrieves evidence based on search criteria, dramatically improving productivity while managing complexity through standardized data structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10346497B1System and method for collecting and tracking evidence
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 PRIMARY MARKING SYST
  • US10346497B1 patent drawing
  • US10346497B1 patent drawing
  • US10346497B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for tagging, organizing and tracking evidence during an investigation has evidence kits and mobile communication devices that collect physical, photographic and interpretive evidence, such as materials from a crime scene, interviews with witnesses and an establishing shot of the crime scene or other areas or persons of interest for surveillance operations. The evidence kits can be used to collect physical evidence, and the mobile devices or other computers are used to upload information about the evidence. Users can enter descriptive information about the evidence into the mobile devices while other information pertaining to the evidence may be obtained from other sources and automatically provided to the users for their review and possible incorporation into the record. Each mobile device can store information in memory and communicate the information to the central server computer where it may then be made available to groups of mobile device users.