Evoked Potential Classification for Real-Time Nerve Injury Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during surgery is limited by the availability and cost of highly trained personnel, and existing systems fail to effectively address positioning effects outside the operating room due to variations in waveform amplitude, frequency, and shape caused by anesthesia and electrical interference.

Innovation Solution

A computer algorithm for characterizing and classifying electrophysiological evoked potentials (EPs) that automates the analysis of EP waveforms, using ensemble averaging and pattern recognition to minimize false positives and negatives, and provides real-time feedback to detect nerve injuries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If highly trained technologists and neurologists are used to monitor and interpret EP waveforms, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEP waveform interpretation accuracyVSAvoidpersonnel and equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service monitoring by automating the EP waveform analysis through computer algorithms that automatically detect, characterize, and classify evoked potentials without requiring expert personnel interpretation. The algorithm independently processes the signals and generates monitoring results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human expert interpretation with an automated computer-based algorithm. The algorithm substitutes the cognitive analysis performed by technologists and neurologists with computational signal processing and pattern recognition methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If expert personnel are fully engaged in interpreting EP waveforms, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity and accessibility decrease due to rationing of services

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEP change detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring service availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated algorithm performs self-service monitoring by independently analyzing EP waveforms without requiring expert personnel engagement for each case. This enables the system to handle multiple patients simultaneously, dramatically increasing service availability and eliminating the need to ration monitoring based on expert personnel availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems are used, then reliability is maintained in controlled settings, but adaptability decreases for use outside operating rooms where positioning effects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring accuracyVSAvoidclinical setting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated monitoring system is designed with universal applicability across multiple clinical settings. The algorithm can process EP waveforms regardless of whether they are recorded in operating rooms, recovery areas, or other clinical environments, making the system adaptable to various locations where positioning effects may occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different clinical environments by dynamically adjusting analysis parameters based on the recorded signal characteristics. The algorithm can accommodate variations in waveform quality, amplitude, and frequency that occur in different settings, maintaining reliable detection across diverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12575988B2System, method, and computer algorithm for characterization and classification of electrophysiological evoked potentials
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 SAFEOP SURGICAL INC
  • US12575988B2 patent drawing
  • US12575988B2 patent drawing
  • US12575988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated EP analysis apparatus for monitoring, detecting and identifying changes (adverse or recovering) to a physiological system generating the analyzed EPs, wherein the apparatus is adapted to characterize and classify EPs and create alerts of changes (adverse or recovering) to the physiological systems generating the EPs if the acquired EP waveforms change significantly in latency, amplitude or morphology.