Evolutional Deep Neural Networks for Long-Time PDE Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting dynamics over long times using neural networks, such as PINNs, face challenges with computational complexity and optimization issues, especially for long-time multiscale problems like chaotic turbulent flows, due to the need for extensive training and high storage requirements.

Innovation Solution

The Evolutional Deep Neural Network (EDNN) approach, which represents the solution in space at a single instant and evolves the neural network parameters using governing equations to predict future states without further training, allowing for indefinite long-time predictions while enforcing boundary conditions as hard constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are used to represent spatio-temporal solutions over long time horizons, then the network can capture temporal evolution, but the neural network complexity and optimization space dimension grow prohibitively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction time horizonVSAvoidneural network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spatio-temporal solution representation by separating spatial and temporal dimensions. A neural network represents the spatial solution at a single time instant, while temporal evolution is achieved by evolving the network parameters according to the governing PDEs. This segmentation prevents the exponential growth of network complexity that would occur if the entire spatio-temporal domain were represented by a single network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from representing the solution in the original spatial dimensions to representing it in the neural network parameter space. By evolving parameters rather than expanding the network architecture over time, the method effectively adds a temporal dimension to the parameter evolution process without increasing spatial complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Duration of action of moving object

If physics-informed neural networks are trained to minimize PDE residuals over extended time horizons, then temporal evolution can be captured, but computational cost and storage requirements become prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction time horizonVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary training of the neural network to represent the initial spatial condition. Once trained, the network parameters are evolved forward in time using the governing PDEs without requiring additional training computations. This preliminary action approach eliminates the need for continuous expensive optimization over extended time horizons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the iterative optimization mechanism (gradient descent for minimizing PDE residuals) with a direct parameter evolution approach based on the governing equations. Instead of mechanically iterating through optimization steps to capture temporal evolution, the method substitutes this with analytical or semi-an analytical parameter updates derived from the PDEs themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If a single neural network represents the entire spatio-temporal solution, then the approach is computationally efficient for short times, but it cannot explicitly specify temporal evolution or causality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtemporal evolution information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the neural network by making the parameters time-dependent. Rather than a static network representing the entire spatio-temporal domain, the network parameters evolve dynamically according to the governing PDEs, explicitly capturing temporal evolution and causality while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240143970A1Evolutional deep neural networks
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US20240143970A1 patent drawing
  • US20240143970A1 patent drawing
  • US20240143970A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments provide a method of predicting a state of a system that is represented by a partial differential equation. The method comprises training a neural network for an initial state of said system to obtain a set of neural network parameters to provide a spatial representation of said system at an initial time. The method further comprises modifying said parameters for intermediate times between said initial time and a prediction time such that each modified set of parameters is used to provide a respective spatial representation of said system at each corresponding intermediate time using said neural network. The method further comprises modifying said set of parameters to provide a prediction set of parameters that is used to provide a predicted spatial representation of said system at said prediction time using said neural network.