Evolved Silk Fiber Structures for Light Scattering and Heat Insulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Natural biological nanostructures, such as silk fibers and beetle scales, have evolved over millions of years to exhibit strong light scattering and heat insulation properties, but existing methods lack the ability to artificially accelerate their evolution for enhanced performance in practical applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving computational evolution of biological structures to obtain evolved descriptors, which are then inverse-mapped to real space to design and construct evolved structures using techniques like electrospinning, 3D printing, and spray coating, aiming to surpass the performance of natural structures in light scattering and heat insulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If natural biological structures are used directly, then they exhibit strong light scattering and heat insulation properties, but they require millions of years to evolve and cannot be optimized for specific applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight scattering and heat insulation propertiesVSAvoidevolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies computational evolution algorithms to pre-optimize fiber structures in silico before manufacturing, achieving millions of years of evolutionary optimization compressed into computational time. The system calculates optimal fiber diameter distributions, orientations, and packing densities that maximize light scattering and heat insulation, then directly manufactures these pre-optimized structures using electrospinning or 3D printing, eliminating the need for natural evolutionary time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces natural biological evolution (a mechanical/biological process spanning millions of years) with computational algorithms and direct manufacturing. Evolutionary optimization is substituted with computer-based genetic algorithms or gradient descent methods that evaluate structural parameters and their optical/thermal properties, then directly fabricate the optimal design without biological evolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If computational evolution is used to optimize structure, then performance can be enhanced for specific applications, but the design and construction process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight scattering and heat insulation propertiesVSAvoidcomputational evolution and inverse mapping process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential structural parameters needed for light scattering and heat insulation performance (fiber diameter distribution, orientation angles, packing density) from complex biological structures. The computational evolution algorithm optimizes only these critical parameters rather than entire structural configurations, simplifying the design space while maintaining performance enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies key structural parameters (fiber diameter from 50-500 nm, orientation angles, fill fractions) within defined ranges during computational evolution. By focusing optimization on a limited set of controllable parameters rather than complete structural redesign, the system achieves performance enhancement while managing computational and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fiber diameter and fill fraction are optimized for light scattering, then scattering performance improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight scattering performanceVSAvoidfiber diameter and orientation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves sufficient light scattering performance by optimizing fiber diameter and orientation within practical manufacturing ranges rather than pursuing theoretical optima. The computational evolution identifies parameter ranges that provide adequate performance while remaining manufacturable, accepting partial optimization in exchange for manufacturing feasibility. For example, targeting fiber diameters of 100-300 nm that are achievable with standard electrospinning rather than narrower optimal values requiring specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The evolved structures demonstrate improved light scattering and heat insulation properties, with mean fiber diameters ranging from 0.25 microns to 1.76 microns, fill fractions between 0.06-0.4, and effective transport mean free paths from 0.8 microns to 50 microns, outperforming raw silk in thermal insulation and light scattering capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

electrospinning the second solution based on the evolved structure design

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrospinning: Electrohydrodynamics

Implementation Method 2

these fibrillar voids guide light into the fiber axis direction through two-dimensional Anderson localization with a low refractive index contrast of approximately 1.55-1.58

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnderson localization: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

silk fibers have a high emissivity over the atmospheric transparency window in mid-infrared (IR). As such, silk fibers may be cooled by radiating heat into outside space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 4

obtain scattering properties of a biological structure; computationally evolving the biological structure to obtain one or more evolved descriptor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS20220365512A1Accelerated evolution and restructuring techniques for developing evolved structures
Publication Date: 2022.11.17 UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS
  • US20220365512A1 patent drawing
  • US20220365512A1 patent drawing
  • US20220365512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for developing an evolved structure by artificial evolution includes: obtaining one or more properties of a biological structure; computationally evolve the biological structure to obtain an evolved descriptor; inverse-mapping the evolved description to real space to form an evolved structure design; and constructing the evolved structure. The evolved structure comprises stronger performance across the properties than the biological structure. In an example aspect, a method for constructing an evolved structure includes: removing sericin from a cocoon; forming a first solution from the cocoon with removed sericin; forming a silk fibroin powder from the first solution; dissolving the silk fibroin powder to form a second solution; and electro spinning the second solution based on the evolved structure design.