Evolving Tread Sipes for Snow Grip Through Tire Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Snow tires lose grip effectiveness as the tread wears down due to decreased slenderness of rubber blades, which reduces the biting effect on snow-covered surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A tire design featuring a tread with complex sipes and grooves formed in a first rubber composition, and a second layer of material extending laterally beyond the complex sipes, which appears at advanced wear levels to enhance grip on snow and wet surfaces, using different rubber compositions for optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the tread is new with high slenderness ratio blades, then the biting effect on snow is improved, but the grip deteriorates as the tread wears and blade height decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip effectivenessVSAvoidtread wear life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sipe geometry dynamically changes with tread wear. Initially, the sipes have narrow openings providing high slenderness ratio blades for biting into snow. As the tread wears, the sipe openings widen, transforming the structure to maintain effective blade geometry and grip performance throughout the tread's service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the sipes - specifically the opening width and blade configuration - to adapt to different wear stages. The sipe design includes variable width openings that allow the rubber blades to maintain optimal slenderness ratio even as the overall tread thickness decreases during wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If complex sipes with variable width are used, then grip is maintained at advanced wear levels, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip on snow and wet surfacesVSAvoidtread structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sipes feature locally varied geometry with different opening widths at different positions and depths. This local quality variation allows specific regions of the sipe to perform different functions - narrower regions for biting action and wider regions for snow/water reservoir formation - thereby maintaining grip without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a third dimension to the sipe structure by varying the opening width through the depth of the sipe, not just at the surface. This creates a three-dimensional complex geometry that allows the same sipe structure to provide both initial biting capability and advanced-wear grip maintenance through differential width zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11738601B2Tire with tread comprising an evolving tread pattern with sipes
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • US11738601B2 patent drawing
  • US11738601B2 patent drawing
  • US11738601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tire having a tread with a plurality of blocks 12 provided with at least one sipe 22 extending from the contact face of said block, and having a width that can vary in the direction of its depth, and known as a complex sipe. The tread has a first layer of material 38 and at least one second layer of material 40 radially on the inside of the first layer, the first layer being formed in a first rubber composition and the second layer being formed in a second rubber composition different from the first composition. The complex sipe 22 and the grooves separating the blocks are formed entirely in the first layer of material 38. Laterally on each side of the complex sipe, the second layer of material 40 extends, when viewed in transverse section in the block, beyond the bottom 30 of the complex sipe in the direction of the contact face of the block.