eVTOL Control Allocation for Noise and Battery Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft face challenges in control allocation due to their over-actuated systems, which complicate the distribution of control effort among multiple actuators, and also generate noise and uneven battery energy usage.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves solving an optimization objective function that prioritizes meeting force and moment commands while modulating rotor acoustics and balancing battery pack energy as secondary objectives. This includes varying rotor speeds, minimizing propeller tip speed, and preferentially utilizing electric propulsion units powered by battery packs with greater charge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple electric propulsion units are used to provide vertical thrust and forward thrust, then the aircraft achieves VTOL capability and forward flight capability, but noise generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVTOL and forward flight capabilityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by modulating the speed of individual propellers in a cyclic pattern. During forward flight, propellers are selectively slowed or reversed in a rotating sequence, creating periodic variations in thrust that reduce overall noise while maintaining forward propulsion. This transforms continuous high-speed operation into a periodic pattern that spreads acoustic energy across different time intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing each propeller to operate at different speeds or reverse individually while others maintain forward thrust. This creates localized variations in thrust distribution across the aircraft's propulsion system, enabling noise reduction at specific locations and times while maintaining overall flight performance through coordinated control of multiple propellers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Use of energy by moving object

If multiple battery packs are used to power electric propulsion units, then energy capacity increases, but uneven energy consumption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy capacityVSAvoidenergy distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the charge levels of multiple battery packs and using this information to dynamically adjust the power distribution to electric propulsion units. The control system receives feedback on battery states and automatically balances energy consumption by directing more power to battery packs with higher charge levels, preventing uneven discharge and maintaining stable energy distribution across the power system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the power distribution system adaptive and changeable based on real-time battery conditions. Instead of fixed power allocation, the system dynamically adjusts which propulsion units receive power from which battery packs, allowing the energy distribution strategy to evolve as battery charge levels change during flight operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If control effort is distributed among multiple actuators, then control precision improves, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing the control system to handle multiple functions through a unified control architecture. The same control system manages both vertical thrust control and forward flight control, as well as noise reduction and energy balancing, without requiring separate dedicated systems for each function. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity while maintaining precise control across all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies merging by combining multiple control objectives into a single integrated control framework. Instead of separately controlling thrust, noise, and energy distribution, the system merges these control tasks into one unified allocation algorithm that simultaneously optimizes all parameters, reducing the complexity that would arise from multiple independent control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12291343B2Systems and methods for control allocation for electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 ARCHER AVIATION INC
  • US12291343B2 patent drawing
  • US12291343B2 patent drawing
  • US12291343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling an electric aircraft that has a plurality of actuators that includes a plurality of electric propulsion units includes: receiving force and moment commands for the electric aircraft; determining control commands for the plurality of actuators based on the desired force and moment commands by solving an optimization problem that comprises a noise minimization term for minimizing noise generated by the electric propulsion units; and controlling the plurality of actuators according to the determined control commands to meet the force and moment commands for the electric aircraft.