eVTOL Torque Mixing with Attitude Priority Under Torque Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft technologies face challenges in flight control, particularly in energy efficiency and cost savings, which complicates development for manned and unmanned flights.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for flight control in electric aircraft that includes a flight controller and a mixer, which provide an initial vehicle torque signal, adjust it based on vehicle torque limits and prioritization data, and generate output torque commands to ensure safe and efficient flight operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If torque allocation is optimized for energy efficiency, then energy consumption is reduced, but flight control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidflight control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system segments torque allocation into hierarchical levels: high-level flight controller generates initial torque signals, mixer receives and processes these signals with prioritization data, and individual propulsors execute specific torque commands. This segmentation allows complex energy optimization to be distributed across multiple specialized components rather than centralized in one complex controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring prioritization data that ranks different attitude commands (pitch, roll, yaw) in advance. When torque limits are encountered, the mixer uses these pre-established priorities to automatically determine which commands to maintain and which to reduce, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multiple attitude commands are prioritized differently, then torque allocation efficiency is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer applies local quality by treating different attitude commands (pitch, roll, yaw) with different priority levels specific to each command type. Each attitude command receives customized prioritization based on its importance to safe flight operations, allowing optimized torque allocation tailored to local requirements of each control axis rather than uniform treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting torque commands based on prioritization data and current flight conditions. The mixer modifies attitude commands in real-time by applying weight factors and priority multipliers to transform initial torque signals into optimized output commands, adapting torque distribution without changing the fundamental control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If torque limits are enforced strictly, then flight safety is improved, but maneuverability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer implements partial action by applying torque limits selectively rather than uniformly to all commands. When a torque limit is approached, the system partially reduces only the lower-priority attitude commands while maintaining full torque for high-priority commands, achieving safety compliance without completely sacrificing maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system becomes dynamic by continuously monitoring torque limits and adjusting command priorities in real-time based on flight conditions. The mixer can dynamically shift priority levels and torque distribution as the aircraft transitions between different flight phases, allowing strict limit enforcement during critical maneuvers while permitting greater flexibility during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11952105B2System and method for flight control in electric aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 BETA AIR LLC
  • US11952105B2 patent drawing
  • US11952105B2 patent drawing
  • US11952105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for flight control in electric aircraft includes a flight controller configured to provide an initial vehicle torque signal including a plurality of attitude commands. The system includes a mixer configured to receive the initial vehicle torque signal and a vehicle torque limit, receive prioritization data including a prioritization datum corresponding to each of the plurality of attitude command, determine a plurality of modified attitude commands as a function of the vehicle torque limit, the attitude commands, and the prioritization data, generate, as a function of modified attitude commands, an output torque command including the initial vehicle torque signal adjusted as a function of the vehicle torque limit, generate, as a function of the output torque command, a remaining vehicle torque. The system includes a display, wherein the display is configured to present, to a user, the remaining vehicle torque and the output torque command.