Excavator Boom Control for Grade Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction machines, such as excavators, often dig below the desired grade due to user inexperience or delays in the hydraulic system, leading to unintended excavation below the specified grade.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine the position of the excavator's bucket and actuate the boom to prevent it from moving below the desired grade by overriding user inputs, using a controller that receives data from site sensors and location information to assess the potential movement of the stick and bucket relative to the desired grade.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the stick is actuated to move the bucket quickly, then productivity is improved, but the bucket may dig below the desired grade due to hydraulic system delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexcavation speedVSAvoidgrade accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by monitoring the boom position and predicting potential grade violations before the stick actuation completes. When a violation is predicted, the system preemptively adjusts the boom position to prevent the bucket from digging below the desired grade, rather than waiting for the violation to occur and then correcting it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring the positions of the boom, stick, and bucket, as well as from the site sensors that detect the desired grade. This real-time feedback allows the control system to calculate the predicted bucket position and adjust the boom actuation accordingly to maintain grade accuracy while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the operator uses the excavator without assistance, then ease of operation is maintained, but digging below the desired grade occurs due to inexperience or accident

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidgrade accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service by automatically monitoring its own operation through sensors on the boom, stick, and bucket, and by using site sensors to detect the desired grade. The control system independently calculates potential grade violations and automatically adjusts the boom position to prevent violations, making the system self-correcting without requiring operator intervention or expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the operator's manual control and judgment with an automated control system that uses sensors and algorithms to monitor and adjust the excavator's operation. This substitution of mechanical/operator control with an automated system eliminates human error and inexperience while maintaining ease of operation, as the operator simply provides commands and the system handles the precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If the boom actuation is delayed due to hydraulic system response time, then ease of operation is maintained, but the bucket digs below the desired grade before the boom can respond

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol responsivenessVSAvoidgrade accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating the predicted bucket position based on current boom and stick positions and the requested stick movement. This prediction is made before the hydraulic actuation completes, allowing the system to preemptively adjust the boom position to account for the hydraulic delay and prevent grade violations before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses continuous feedback from sensors monitoring the actual positions of the boom, stick, and bucket to detect discrepancies between the predicted and actual positions. This feedback allows the control system to make real-time adjustments to the boom actuation to compensate for hydraulic system delays and maintain grade accuracy throughout the movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240247461A1Method and apparatus for machine operator command attenuation
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 TOPCON POSITIONING SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240247461A1 patent drawing
  • US20240247461A1 patent drawing
  • US20240247461A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for machine operator command attenuation includes the step of detecting a position of a boom, stick, and bucket of a hydraulic implement of a construction machine. Movement of the stick is detected by a controller. The controller determines if the movement of the stick will cause excavation below a desired grade. If the movement will not cause excavation below a desired grade, the controller will take no action. If the movement will cause excavation below a desired grade, the controller will command the boom to raise.