Excavator Coupler Blocking Bar Mechanism for Hydraulic Failure Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing couplers for excavators with hydraulically operated latching hooks lack an effective safety mechanism to prevent attachment disengagement in case of hydraulic failure, posing a risk of accidental detachment during operation.

Innovation Solution

A coupler design featuring a latching member and a blocking member, where the blocking member is urged into a blocking state by an attachment pin, and a lever mechanism that engages with the latching hook to retain the blocking member in place, ensuring the attachment remains secured even if the latching hook retracts due to hydraulic failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a hydraulically operated latching hook is used to engage with attachment pins, then the coupling operation is automated and efficient, but the system lacks adequate safety mechanism to prevent accidental disengagement in case of hydraulic failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic operation of latching hookVSAvoidsafety against accidental disengagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking member is pre-positioned to block the first pin-receiving recess, preventing pin insertion. The lever is pre-configured to automatically engage the blocking member when the latching hook moves from latched to unlatched position, creating a preliminary safety barrier before any disengagement can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The lever acts as an intermediary mechanical component that translates the motion of the latching hook into engagement of the blocking member. This mechanical intermediary ensures that when hydraulic power fails and the latching hook moves, the blocking member is automatically activated to prevent attachment disengagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a blocking member is added to prevent accidental disengagement, then safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety mechanismVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lever combines multiple functions: it holds the blocking member out of the blocking state during normal operation, and automatically engages the blocking member when the latching hook moves to the unlatched position. This merging of functions reduces the need for separate control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lever is resiliently biased to automatically engage the blocking member when the latching hook moves, without requiring external control or additional actuators. The system uses its own operational motions to trigger the safety mechanism, making it self-regulating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced safety by maintaining the attachment securely engaged with the coupler, preventing accidental disengagement and ensuring operational reliability even in the event of hydraulic failure, while allowing controlled disengagement when necessary.

Implementation Method 1

the lever being resiliently biased into contact with the rear of the latching hook

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8328459B2Coupler for excavators
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 HILL IAN
  • US8328459B2 patent drawing
  • US8328459B2 patent drawing
  • US8328459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coupler for an excavator, the coupler comprising first and second recesses for receiving the pins of an attachment, a latching hook movable into and out of a latching state in which it closes the second pin-receiving recess, and a blocking bar movable into and out of a blocking state in which a portion of the blocking bar closes the first recess. The arrangement is such that, when the blocking bar is engaged in use by an attachment pin contained within the first recess, the action of the pin on the blocking bar urges the blocking bar into its blocking state. The blocking bar is further arranged so that, in the blocking state, it lies in the path of the latching hook and that, upon movement of the latching hook out of the latching state, the latching hook engages with the blocking bar to retain it in the blocking state.