Excavator Boom Control Across Design Face Junctions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing excavation control systems for hydraulic excavators face challenges in preventing the bucket from entering design faces with different inclinations when passing through junctions, leading to sudden velocity changes and potential bucket intrusion, which can result in reduced work efficiency and increased operator burden.

Innovation Solution

A work machine with a controller that generates a supplemented design face passing through or above the junction between adjacent design faces, setting its curvature based on the operation amount, and executing semi-automatic excavation control to maintain the working point on or above the target face, thereby preventing bucket intrusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the limit velocity is selected based on the closer design face or greater boom raising velocity, then the bucket can be prevented from entering design faces under normal conditions, but the target velocity suddenly changes when passing through junctions, causing the bucket to possibly enter design faces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebucket position control accuracyVSAvoidvelocity command stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting the bucket's future position based on current velocity and operation amount before the bucket actually reaches the junction. This allows the control system to prepare appropriate velocity commands in advance, avoiding sudden changes when the bucket crosses the junction between design faces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the velocity command based on real-time conditions including operation amount, bucket position, and predicted trajectory. By making the velocity command adaptive rather than fixed, the system maintains stability during junction transitions while still preventing bucket intrusion into design faces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the operator reduces arm velocity to prevent bucket intrusion, then the bucket can be kept from entering design faces, but the work amount is reduced and operation becomes cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebucket position control accuracyVSAvoidwork amount
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically adjusts the velocity command to prevent bucket intrusion without requiring the operator to manually reduce operation intensity. The system serves itself by detecting potential intrusion risks and autonomously correcting the velocity, eliminating the need for cumbersome operator interventions while maintaining full work efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the target velocity is suddenly changed at design face junctions, then the control can respond to new constraints, but the actual boom motion cannot follow up, allowing bucket intrusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstraint complianceVSAvoidboom response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By calculating the predicted bucket position in advance and determining appropriate velocity commands before the bucket reaches the junction, the system avoids sudden target velocity changes. This preliminary calculation ensures that velocity transitions are smooth and within the boom's response capabilities, maintaining both constraint compliance and physical feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial correction to the velocity command based on the predicted trajectory and operation amount, rather than making excessive or abrupt changes. This moderate adjustment approach ensures that the boom can follow the velocity commands while still preventing bucket intrusion into design faces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4036320B1Work machine
Publication Date: 2024.12.25 HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO LTD
  • EP4036320B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4036320B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4036320B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A main controller generates a supplemented design face that passes through a junction or above the junction between a first design face and a second design face adjacent to each other, among a plurality of design faces, the supplemented design face having one end thereof positioned on the first design face and another end thereof positioned on the second design face, sets a curvature 1/R of the supplemented design face according to an arm operation amount of an operation lever device, and executes semi-automatic excavation control to control a boom cylinder with one of the faces included in the supplemented design face being set as the target face.