Hydraulic Excavator Controller for Automatic Leveling Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transition from returning work to leveling work in hydraulic excavators often results in reduced work efficiency and operability due to issues with bucket posture adjustments and automatic operation thresholds, leading to unnecessary boom lowering operations and potential discomfort for operators.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that calculates arm tip and claw tip differences to determine when to execute excavation or leveling work controls, ensuring smooth transitions by maintaining bucket posture relative to the target surface, thereby optimizing work efficiency and operability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the threshold for automatic bucket operation is set to enable leveling work, then work efficiency is improved, but unnecessary automatic operations occur during returning work, reducing operability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoidoperability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the threshold value for automatic bucket operation based on the current work state. When in returning work mode, a higher threshold is used to prevent unnecessary automatic operations, while during leveling work, a lower threshold enables efficient automatic operation. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between productivity and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters (threshold values) based on the detected work mode. By modifying the threshold parameter according to whether the system is in returning work or leveling work mode, it achieves both high operability during returning work and high productivity during leveling work without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the bucket automatic operation is activated during returning work, then transition to leveling work is simplified, but operator comfort is reduced due to unwanted automatic operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition smoothnessVSAvoidoperator discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the work mode before activating automatic bucket operation. By preliminarily determining whether the current state is returning work or leveling work, the system prevents unwanted automatic operations that would cause operator discomfort, while still enabling smooth transitions when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors operational parameters and provides feedback to determine the current work mode. This feedback mechanism ensures that automatic bucket operation is only activated when necessary, maintaining operator comfort while enabling smooth transitions to leveling work mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If a low threshold is used for automatic operation, then leveling work efficiency is maximized, but unnecessary operations during returning work reduce overall productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleveling work efficiencyVSAvoidtime wasted during returning work
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the threshold parameter based on the detected work mode. During returning work, a higher threshold prevents time-wasting automatic operations, while during leveling work, a lower threshold maximizes efficiency. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between overall productivity and leveling work efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the threshold parameter according to work mode, the system optimizes performance for each specific task. This parameter adaptation ensures that time is not wasted during returning work while maintaining high efficiency during leveling work, thereby maximizing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4036318B1Work machine
Publication Date: 2024.12.18 HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO LTD
  • EP4036318B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4036318B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4036318B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a hydraulic excavator including a controller that can control a work device by utilizing an excavation work control for causing a claw tip of a bucket to move along a predetermined target surface and a leveling work control for causing the bucket to move along the target surface while maintaining the posture of the bucket with respect to the target surface, in which: the controller, based on posture data and size data on a work device and position data on the target surface, calculates an arm tip difference Dva that is the distance from the tip of an arm to the target surface; and the controller executes the leveling work control in a case of the calculated arm tip difference being equal to or less than a predetermined threshold dv1, there being no input of a bucket operation to an operation lever, and there being an input of an arm operation to the operation lever, and otherwise executes the excavation work control.