Excavator Movement-Range Control to Cut Unnecessary Stops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing work machines, such as hydraulic excavators, frequently stop unnecessarily when attempting to avoid obstacles, leading to reduced work efficiency due to the need for excessive clearance, which can result in frequent stops even when there is no actual risk of contact.

Innovation Solution

A work machine equipped with a control unit that calculates and executes control commands to stop or decelerate based on both the movement range and the position of obstacles, allowing for earlier and more precise control to avoid collisions, thereby reducing unnecessary stops and maintaining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the work machine performs stop control with clearance from approaching objects, then the possibility of contacting the approaching object is reduced, but the frequency of stopping increases and work efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the control parameters (clearance distance and stop timing) based on the actual risk level. When an approaching object is detected, the control unit calculates the angle interval and compares it with a threshold to determine the appropriate clearance distance. This allows the machine to maintain larger clearance only when necessary, rather than always maintaining excessive clearance, thus improving work efficiency while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The stop control mechanism transitions from a static, fixed clearance approach to a dynamic, adaptive control system. The control unit continuously monitors the angle interval between the attachment and approaching object, and adjusts the clearance distance and stop timing in real-time based on the calculated risk level. This dynamic adjustment allows the machine to operate efficiently when safe while maintaining safety when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the work machine maintains larger clearance from approaching objects, then the possibility of contacting the approaching object is reduced, but unnecessary stops increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidunnecessary stops
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously receives feedback about the position and movement of approaching objects, calculates the angle interval, and compares it with the threshold to determine the appropriate clearance distance. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust the clearance dynamically, maintaining larger clearance only when the angle interval indicates actual risk, thereby avoiding unnecessary stops and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the work machine stops frequently to avoid potential contact, then safety is improved, but work efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameter (clearance distance) based on the calculated angle interval and risk level. When the angle interval is small (high risk), the machine maintains larger clearance and stops earlier. When the angle interval is large (low risk), the machine maintains normal operation with minimal clearance. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by making safety measures proportional to actual risk rather than applying them uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3916161B1Work machine
Publication Date: 2024.04.10 HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO LTD
  • EP3916161B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3916161B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3916161B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a work machine that can suppress decrease in work efficiency while reducing the possibility of contacting a worker or a dump truck, etc. A movement range is set in advance so as to avoid entry of a worker or a dump truck, etc. into the set movement range. The work machine performs stop control with clearance for an obstacle having entered the movement range, but performs stop control with relatively small clearance (minimum clearance) for a movement range. Thus, the work machine can reduce the frequency of stopping a body or a work implement and suppress decrease in work efficiency. Since the work machine controls the body or the work implement to stop with clearance when the worker or the dump truck, etc. enters the movement range of the work machine, the work machine can reduce the possibility of contacting the worker or the dump truck, etc.