Exception Simulator for Software Interrupt Management
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Software routines lack the capability to handle exceptions and generate hardware interrupts, as they do not have direct control over hardware-implemented exception handling mechanisms, which is necessary for managing exceptions such as invalid operations or overflow during floating-point operations.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of a computer-readable program code logic that simulates exception handling by using instructions like Load Floating Point Control and Signal, which saves control register contents, determines if an interruption is needed, and provides status indications for exceptions, allowing software routines to manage exceptions and invoke interrupts as necessary.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a function is implemented in software to simulate hardware operations, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the capability to handle exceptions and generate hardware interrupts deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
An intermediary mechanism is introduced between software routines and hardware interrupt systems. The software-generated interrupt signal acts as a mediator that translates software exception conditions into hardware-compatible interrupt formats, allowing software to indirectly control hardware interrupt generation without direct hardware dependency.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention creates a copy of the hardware interrupt generation capability within the software exception simulator. By replicating the essential interrupt signaling functionality in software, the system maintains hardware-like exception handling capabilities while operating within the software execution environment.
2Reliability
If exception handling is implemented in hardware, then exception detection and signaling are improved, but control over exception handling deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of hardware controlling exception handling and software passively receiving interrupts, the invention inverts the control flow by allowing software to actively generate and control interrupt signals. Software routines can deliberately invoke hardware interrupts based on their internal logic and exception conditions, reversing the traditional hardware-to-software control direction.
Solution Approach 2:
The software exception simulator implements self-service by autonomously monitoring its own execution conditions, detecting exceptions within the software routine, and independently generating appropriate interrupt signals without requiring external hardware exception detection mechanisms.
3Adaptability or versatility
If software routines simulate hardware functions, then implementation flexibility is improved, but mechanism complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The software exception simulator is designed with universal functionality that can handle multiple types of exceptions and generate various interrupt types through a single unified mechanism. This multi-functional design consolidates what could be multiple separate software components into one cohesive exception handling system, reducing overall complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
Exception handling is simulated. An exception simulator is employed to simulate exceptions generated from routines simulating operations. The exception simulator provides an indication of the exception and invokes an interruption, when appropriate. The exception simulator includes an instruction invoked to handle the exception and any interruption.


