Excess Gas Conversion Logic for Flaring-Free Product Pathways

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for utilizing excess gas produced by oil and gas facilities are inefficient and often result in venting or flaring, which is environmentally harmful and economically wasteful, lacking a systematic approach to convert this gas into valuable products.

Innovation Solution

A logic-driven algorithm that automatically generates facility configurations using excess gas as a main feed, employing a process identification language to balance inputs and outputs, and utilizes automated simulation engines to determine the most environmentally and economically beneficial product conversion processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If excess gas is vented or flared, then environmental harm and economic waste occur, but the cost to bring gas to market exceeds revenue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy loss from venting/flaringVSAvoidcomplexity of gas monetization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows excess gas to serve itself by automatically identifying and implementing monetization opportunities through algorithmic analysis of market conditions, eliminating the need for manual case-by-case studies while converting waste into value

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts gas utilization decisions based on changing market parameters including gas prices, electricity rates, and demand conditions, transforming the static venting/flaring decision into a dynamic optimization problem that adapts to economic conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional case-by-case studies are used, then limited options are evaluated, but the process is lengthy and requires custom dedicated models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of gas utilization optionsVSAvoidtime for gas monetization study
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal platform that evaluates multiple gas utilization pathways simultaneously (electrogenesis, chemical synthesis, fuel production) using standardized algorithms, replacing the need for custom dedicated models for each case while expanding the range of evaluated options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical case-by-case analysis with an automated algorithmic engine that processes market data and generates optimization recommendations, eliminating the time-consuming human analysis phase while maintaining comprehensive evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If gas is converted to sellable products, then economic value is created, but additional equipment and infrastructure are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas monetization revenueVSAvoidfacility configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the gas monetization process into distinct pathway options (electrogenesis, chemical synthesis, fuel production) that can be independently evaluated and implemented, allowing facilities to select and implement only the pathways appropriate to their specific context rather than requiring complete systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12561501B2System and method for excess gas utilization
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US12561501B2 patent drawing
  • US12561501B2 patent drawing
  • US12561501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes adding a core logic block to a system design, in which the core logic block is representative of a process for converting excess gas provided by a feed logic block into a product, connecting the core logic block to the feed logic block, identifying an adjustment to the excess gas provided by the feed logic block, the product produced by the core logic block, or both, adding a utility logic block to the system design to implement the adjustment to the excess gas provided by the feed logic block, the product produced by the core logic block, or both, connecting the utility logic block to the feed logic block, the core logic block, or both, determining a power balance for the system design, and outputting the system design in response to determining that the power balance for the system design is within an acceptable range.