Auditory Excitation Pattern Computation Using Enhanced Detector Pruning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for calculating auditory patterns, such as the Moore-Glasberg method, are computationally expensive and often result in reduced accuracy when attempting to reduce complexity, leading to significant errors in loudness estimation due to the large number of detectors and frequency components required.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating a power spectrum, filtering it to obtain an effective power spectrum, determining an intensity pattern, and using enhanced iterative detector pruning to select a subset of pruned detector locations, thereby reducing computational complexity while maintaining high accuracy by interpolating the excitation pattern from these locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods (Moore-Glasberg) use a large number of detectors and frequency components to calculate excitation patterns, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and computational cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloudness estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary detectors and frequency components from the conventional Moore-Glasberg method. By identifying and eliminating redundant computational elements while retaining the essential components needed for accurate loudness estimation, the method achieves significant computational simplification without sacrificing measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simplified, computationally inexpensive approximations for the excitation pattern calculation. Instead of using complex, resource-intensive models, it adopts lighter computational representations that achieve comparable accuracy with fraction of the computational cost, effectively replacing expensive calculations with cheaper alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Device complexity

If conventional methods reduce the number of detectors to decrease computational complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to significant errors in loudness estimation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidloudness estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key parameters of the detection system, specifically the spacing and distribution of detectors along the basilar membrane. By optimizing these parameters, the method achieves accurate loudness estimation with fewer detectors. The parameter optimization ensures that computational complexity is reduced while measurement precision is maintained through strategic detector placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If conventional methods use evenly spaced detectors throughout the auditory frequency range, then coverage is improved, but computational complexity increases due to the large number of detectors required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency range coverageVSAvoidnumber of detectors
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using non-uniform spacing of detectors, concentrating them in frequency regions where the auditory system is most sensitive and where excitation patterns vary most rapidly. This allows for reduced overall detector count while maintaining adequate coverage and accuracy, as different regions of the frequency spectrum are sampled with appropriate local density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10013992B2Fast computation of excitation pattern, auditory pattern and loudness
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US10013992B2 patent drawing
  • US10013992B2 patent drawing
  • US10013992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes the steps of calculating a power spectrum from an auditory stimulus, filtering the power spectrum to obtain an effective power spectrum, calculating an intensity pattern from the effective power spectrum, calculating a median intensity pattern from the intensity pattern, determining an initial set of pruned detector locations, examining the initial set of pruned detector locations to determine an enhanced set of pruned detector locations, and calculating an excitation pattern from the effective power spectrum using the enhanced set of pruned detector locations. By determining the enhanced set of pruned detector locations from the initial set of pruned detector locations and computing the excitation pattern therefrom, the computational complexity of the above method can be significantly reduced when compared to conventional approaches while maintaining the accuracy thereof.