Executable Instruction Delay Queues for Latency Arbitrage Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Liquidity providers in financial markets face challenges from latency arbitrageurs who exploit pricing disparities, leading to reduced liquidity and increased costs for providers trying to compete in speed, with regulatory scrutiny potentially eliminating incentives for providing liquidity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Liquidity Enhancing Access Delay (LEAD) system that intentionally delays the processing of new orders in a Matching System based on predefined criteria, allowing slower providers to adjust to market conditions before executing trades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated trading systems execute orders immediately upon arrival at the Matching System, then trading speed and productivity are improved, but latency arbitrageurs exploit pricing disparities causing harm to liquidity providers and reducing market stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder execution speedVSAvoidlatency arbitrage impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of incoming orders against delay criteria before immediate execution. The LEAD queue acts as a preliminary holding area where orders are assessed for potential latency arbitrage characteristics before being released for matching, preventing harmful rapid executions while allowing legitimate fast trades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The LEAD queue serves as an intermediary mechanism between order receipt and immediate execution. This intermediate structure allows the system to buffer and evaluate orders, introducing a controlled delay that prevents latency arbitrageurs from exploiting pricing disparities while maintaining overall market efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If liquidity providers compete by increasing system speed to match latency arbitrageurs, then response time is improved, but system complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the system faster to compete with latency arbitrageurs, the invention inverts the approach by intentionally slowing down specific orders through the LEAD queue. This reverse strategy prevents the need for continuous speed escalation while maintaining fairness and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a delay queue is introduced to postpone order execution, then latency arbitrage impact is reduced, but processing time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency arbitrage impactVSAvoidorder processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies delay selectively rather than universally. Only orders meeting specific delay criteria are placed in the LEAD queue, while other orders execute immediately. This partial application of delay minimizes overall processing time loss while effectively countering latency arbitrage for problematic orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the processing parameter (execution timing) based on order characteristics. By evaluating each order against delay criteria and adjusting its processing time accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between preventing latency arbitrage and maintaining overall trading efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12380506B2System and method for delaying an executable instruction that would otherwise be executable immediately upon arrival at an executing system
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 NYSE CHICAGO INC
  • US12380506B2 patent drawing
  • US12380506B2 patent drawing
  • US12380506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for intentionally delaying an execution of an executable instruction by determining if a current executable instruction is received from a predefined source for which all executable instructions are to be intentionally delayed. When so, the system sets a sequence time associated with the instruction equal to a receipt time plus a delay time. The system saves the instruction in an intentional delay queue for future execution. When the current executable instruction is received from a source that is not the predefined source, the system determines if a condition for immediate processing of the current executable instruction is present. When so, the system executes the instruction immediately. Otherwise, it performs an intentional delay determination that determines whether the current executable instruction has been intentionally delayed. When the current executable instruction has been intentionally delayed, the system executes the instruction immediately.