Executable Object Adaptation Across Heterogeneous Processing Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphics processing units (GPUs) face challenges in efficiently processing a wide variety of operations due to their fixed function computational units, limiting their performance and flexibility in handling graphics and general-purpose computing tasks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a general-purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU) with programmable components and parallel processing techniques, such as SIMT architecture, to enhance the GPU's ability to handle diverse operations and improve efficiency through pipelining and thread synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed function computational units are used in GPUs, then device complexity is reduced and manufacturing is easier, but adaptability and versatility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse operationsVSAvoidcomputational unit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal computational unit architecture where a single programmable processing element can perform multiple operations including vertex processing, fragment processing, and general-purpose computing tasks. This is achieved through a unified instruction set architecture and configurable execution pipelines that can be dynamically programmed to handle different operation types, eliminating the need for separate fixed-function units for each task type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The computational units are designed with dynamic reconfigurability, allowing the processing elements to change their functional behavior based on the executed program instructions. The execution units can be dynamically allocated and configured to perform different mathematical operations, data transformations, and processing tasks through programmable control logic, enabling adaptability without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If parallel processing techniques are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidprocessing architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing architecture is segmented into multiple independent but synchronized processing blocks, each capable of executing instructions in parallel. The computational workload is divided into thread groups that can be distributed across multiple processing elements, with each element handling a subset of data simultaneously. This segmentation enables high throughput while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple processing elements are merged into a unified parallel processing array that shares common resources such as instruction caches, register files, and memory interfaces. The processing elements work in coordination through synchronized instruction execution, combining their individual capabilities to achieve high productivity while sharing infrastructure to control overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If programmable components are added to enhance versatility, then adaptability is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation varietyVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of manufacturing different hardware configurations for different operations, the patent employs a universal programmable processing element that can be manufactured in a single configuration but programmed to perform multiple operations. This approach simplifies manufacturing by standardizing the hardware design while achieving versatility through software programming and configuration data stored in on-chip memory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing elements incorporate configurable parameters and control registers that can be programmed to change operational characteristics without physical modification. Manufacturing produces a standardized base unit with programmable control logic, and adaptability is achieved by loading different parameter sets and configuration data to adjust the processing behavior for different task types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260056758A1System and method for adapting executable object to a processing unit
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 INTEL CORP
  • US20260056758A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056758A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056758A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are generally directed to a system and method for adapting executable object to a processing unit. An embodiment of a method to adapt an executable object from a first processing unit to a second processing unit, comprises: adapting the executable object optimized for the first processing unit of a first architecture, to the second processing unit of a second architecture, wherein the second architecture is different from the first architecture, wherein the executable object is adapted to perform on the second processing unit based on a plurality of performance metrics collected while the executable object is performed on the first processing unit and the second processing unit.