Exercise Device Resistance Assembly for Foot Path Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing user-defined motion fitness equipment lacks resistance in the fore and aft directions, leading to unpredictable and uncontrollable foot paths, which can frustrate users and increase the risk of injury, while also failing to engage muscles effectively over a large range of motion without applying undesirable impact loads to joints.

Innovation Solution

An exercise apparatus with a crank system, pivotal linkage pendulum system, and both vertical and horizontal resistance systems, providing variable resistance in the range of 0.2 kg to 6.8 kg in the fore and aft directions to stabilize and engage the user's muscles naturally, while allowing for smooth and varied motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If user-defined motion fitness equipment allows free travel in the fore and aft directions, then the user can control the foot path and exercise muscles naturally, but the foot path becomes unpredictable and uncontrollable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot path control freedomVSAvoidfoot path predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing variable resistance that dynamically adjusts based on motion parameters. The resistance system changes its characteristics (magnitude and direction) in response to user motion, transforming the unresisted free travel into controlled resisted motion while preserving natural foot path variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The resistance system incorporates feedback mechanisms that respond to user motion in real-time. The system monitors foot path and motion characteristics, then adjusts resistance forces accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains predictability while allowing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If user-defined motion fitness equipment provides un-resisted free travel, then the user can move freely in multiple directions, but the exercise becomes less effective and may increase injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion freedomVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance system applies preliminary anti-action by providing resistive forces that counterbalance excessive or unpredictable motions before they can lead to injury. The system proactively opposes harmful motion patterns while allowing beneficial natural movements, preventing injury before it occurs rather than reacting afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Device complexity

If existing equipment provides resistance in only one direction, then the resistance system is simple, but it fails to engage muscles effectively over a large range of motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance system simplicityVSAvoidmuscle engagement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional resistance (single direction) to multi-dimensional resistance by adding fore and aft directional resistance components. This dimensional expansion allows the resistance system to engage muscles more effectively throughout the full range of motion while maintaining reasonable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the exercise device allows unpredictable foot path motion, then the user experiences more freedom of movement, but the exercise becomes frustrating and less safe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot path variabilityVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance system employs dynamic characteristics that adapt to user motion patterns. By making the resistance forces dynamic rather than static, the system maintains ease of operation through natural feel while providing the adaptability needed for varied foot paths, resolving the contradiction between control and freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP1938869B1Supplemental resistance assembly for resisting motion of an exercise device
Publication Date: 2012.09.19 PRECOR INC
  • EP1938869B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1938869B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1938869B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An exercise apparatus for a user. The exercise apparatus includes a frame, a crank system coupled to the frame, a pivotal linkage pendulum system, a foot member and first and second directional resistance systems. The crank system includes one or more crank members. The pivotal linkage pendulum system comprises at least a first link member. The first link member is coupled to the crank system through at least a first pivot point. The first pivot point of the first link member is configured to move in a path during use. The foot member is coupled to the at least one first link member. The first and second directional resistance systems are each coupled to the crank system. The first direction is different from the second direction.