Exercise Rope Adapter Assembly With Bayonet Handle Connection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercise ropes with larger diameters are difficult for individuals with smaller hands to hold for extended periods, limiting their effectiveness and potential workout intensity, and there is a need for a more versatile and ergonomic grip to enhance workout possibilities and prevent injuries.

Innovation Solution

An adapter assembly for exercise ropes that allows for interchangeable accessories, featuring a connection part with a bayonet clutch mechanism to securely attach handles or gears, including a sleeve and locking means to facilitate easy attachment and detachment of accessories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the diameter of the exercise rope is reduced to make it more comfortable for smaller hands, then the comfort and ease of operation is improved, but the weight of the rope is reduced which limits the potential intensity of the workout

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort for smaller handsVSAvoidweight of rope
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The exercise rope system is divided into separate components: a core rope and interchangeable handles. The handles can be detached and replaced with different types (e.g., thicker handles, weighted handles) to provide ergonomic comfort for smaller hands without changing the core rope's weight characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection part is designed as a universal interface that can accommodate multiple types of handles and accessories. This allows a single rope to serve multiple functions and adapt to different user needs, including providing both comfort for smaller hands and sufficient weight for intense workouts through handle selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the diameter of the exercise rope is increased to provide better grip for smaller hands, then the ease of operation is improved, but the rope becomes less effective for intense workouts requiring heavier weights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip for smaller handsVSAvoidweight of rope
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the grip function (handled by interchangeable handles) from the weight function (handled by the core rope), users can select handles with appropriate diameters for their hand size while the core rope maintains its weight for effective workouts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing parameters (handle diameter, handle weight) independently of the core rope characteristics. Users can adjust handle parameters to suit their ergonomic needs while preserving the rope's weight parameter for workout intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If fixed handles are attached to the exercise rope, then the structure is simpler, but the versatility and workout possibilities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidworkout possibilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connection part serves as a universal interface that can accommodate multiple types of handles and accessories, enabling a single rope system to provide diverse workout possibilities without significantly increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, fixed-handle design to a dynamic, interchangeable-handle design. The connection mechanism allows handles to be easily attached and detached, providing adaptability and versatility while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If the exercise rope uses a fixed diameter design, then the manufacturing is simpler, but it cannot provide ergonomic grips for different hand sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidergonomic grip
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly is manufactured as a separate component from the core rope, allowing independent optimization of each part. The handles can be manufactured with ergonomic dimensions for different hand sizes while the core rope maintains its standard diameter for simplified manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A standardized connection interface is designed for the handles, allowing multiple handle types to be manufactured using the same basic design principles and attachment mechanism, thus maintaining manufacturing simplicity while providing ergonomic variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3750602B1Adapter assembly for an exercise rope
Publication Date: 2025.08.20 SNAKEHEADS AB
  • EP3750602B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3750602B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3750602B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An adapter assembly for releasably connecting an accessory connector (70) to an exercise rope (1) is provided. The assembly (2) comprises a connection part (30) being formed by a first portion (30a) and a second portion (30b), each having a bottom end (38b) and top end (38a), wherein the first and the second portion (30a, 30b) of the connection part (30) forms, at its bottom end (38b), a cavity configured to receive an end portion (1a) of said rope (1), and wherein the top end (38a) of the connection part (30) is configured to releasably connect the accessory connector (70).