Modular Exercise Test Station for Automated Calibration Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercise system calibration and testing methods are time-consuming and prone to variability due to human operator differences, necessitating a more efficient and standardized approach.

Innovation Solution

An exercise system test station with a modular design, incorporating a frame, trolley, and automated guided vehicle (AGV) that deploys test assemblies to perform calibration and quality control tests on exercise systems moving along a production line, ensuring consistency and automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated testing systems are implemented, then productivity and consistency improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtest station complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test station is divided into modular components including a frame, trolley, deployable test assemblies, and AGV interface elements. Each test assembly can be independently deployed and configured, allowing the system to handle different exercise system types without requiring complete system redesign, thus improving productivity while managing complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The test station is designed with universal capabilities to test multiple types of exercise systems (treadmills, bikes, ellipticals, etc.) using the same basic infrastructure. The deployable test assemblies can be configured for different testing requirements, and the AGV interface accommodates various product formats, enabling one system to perform multiple functions and thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual calibration methods are used, then device complexity remains low, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to human operator differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration consistencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test station performs self-calibration and self-testing operations through automated mechanisms. The AGV autonomously navigates to position exercise systems, and the test assemblies automatically execute calibration routines without requiring manual intervention, ensuring consistent precision while reducing the complexity burden of manual calibration processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual calibration operations are replaced with automated mechanical and electronic systems. Sensors, actuators, and control systems perform calibration measurements and adjustments that previously required human operators, thereby improving manufacturing precision through consistency while managing device complexity through systematic automation design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive quality control testing is performed, then reliability improves, but loss of time increases due to extensive testing procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control assuranceVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The test station performs preliminary calibration and testing operations before final product completion. By conducting quality control checks early in the production process rather than as a separate final step, the system ensures reliability while reducing total testing time through integrated rather than sequential operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AGV continuously moves exercise systems through the production line without interruption, and testing operations are performed in continuous sequence rather than batch processing. The automated system maintains continuous operation with minimal idle time between tests, ensuring comprehensive quality control while minimizing time loss through uninterrupted workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240230476A1Exercise system test station systems and methods
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 PELOTON INTERACTIVE INC
  • US20240230476A1 patent drawing
  • US20240230476A1 patent drawing
  • US20240230476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Exercise system test station systems and methods are provided. The test station may include a frame and a trolley movably coupled to the frame. The trolley may include at least one deployable test assembly configured to perform one or more tests on an exercise system when the exercise system is positioned within the frame. The test station may include a workstation and/or a safety light curtain. The at least one deployable test assembly may include a spinner assembly configured to drive a portion of the drivetrain of the exercise system, a knob tester mechanism, a sound and vibration test module, or any combination thereof. The test station may be provided as part of a production line. The product line may include an AGV configured to carry the exercise system through production. Associated methods of testing the exercise system using the test station are also provided.