Exfoliating Single Crystal Materials for Lattice-Matched Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of lattice-matched substrates for epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors and the introduction of defects due to lattice mismatch in alternative substrates hinder the development of efficient and cost-effective semiconductor devices, particularly in photovoltaic applications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves exfoliating slabs of single crystal materials like Bi2Se3 and In2Se3 to create low-cost, lattice-matched substrates for epitaxial growth, using techniques such as indium-bonded exfoliation and surface conversion to ZnSe, enabling the growth of high-efficiency GaAs films with minimal defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lattice-matched substrates are used for epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors, then device performance and efficiency are improved, but substrate cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidsubstrate cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is segmented into two functional parts: a cheap sacrificial layer (e.g., SiO2, Si3N4, or polymer) that provides mechanical support, and a thin released membrane (e.g., Ge, SiGe, or III-V material) that serves as the actual epitaxial growth substrate. This segmentation allows the expensive lattice-matched substrate functionality to be achieved only where needed, while using inexpensive materials for structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sacrificial layer acts as an intermediary between the cheap carrier substrate and the expensive lattice-matched epitaxial substrate. This intermediary is deposited on the carrier substrate, then selectively removed (via etching or dissolution) to release and transfer the epitaxial substrate to a new support structure, enabling cost reduction while maintaining device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If low-cost substrates like silicon are used, then substrate cost is reduced, but lattice mismatch introduces defects that harm device development

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate costVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The epitaxial growth is performed preliminarily on a lattice-matched substrate where perfect crystal structure can be achieved, then the grown layer is transferred to a cheap carrier substrate. This preliminary action on the appropriate substrate ensures high crystalline quality before cost optimization through substrate replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The crystal structure and lattice arrangement are copied from the lattice-matched substrate to the epitaxial layer during growth, then this copied structure is transferred to the cheap carrier substrate. The copying process preserves the high-quality crystal structure while enabling cost reduction through substrate replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If substrate recycling is implemented, then raw material cost is reduced, but cleaning and wafer repolishing steps become costly and reduce effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveraw material costVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier substrate is designed as a disposable, cheap component (using materials like SiO2, Si3N4, or polymers) that is sacrificed during the process. Instead of recycling the expensive epitaxial substrate, the cheap carrier is discarded after single use, eliminating the need for costly cleaning and repolishing operations while maintaining economic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of manufacture

If homoepitaxy with substrate recycling is used, then substrate cost is mitigated, but yield and scalability remain uncertain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate costVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into a reusable template (the epitaxial layer with its crystal structure) and a disposable carrier. This segmentation allows multiple copies to be produced from a single template by transferring the grown layer to new cheap carriers, enabling scalable production without the yield limitations of substrate recycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides atomically flat, low-cost substrates that maintain high crystalline quality, reducing the cost of semiconductor devices and minimizing defects, thus enhancing the efficiency and scalability of photovoltaic technologies.

Implementation Method 1

indium-bonded exfoliation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

converting the surface of the Selenide-based 2D layered material to ZnSe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11302531B2Methods of exfoliating single crystal materials
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 ALLIANCE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION LLC
  • US11302531B2 patent drawing
  • US11302531B2 patent drawing
  • US11302531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods for exfoliation of single crystals allowing for growth of high crystalline quality on the exfoliated surfaces for III-V photovoltaics. Also disclosed herein are methods for growing GaAs (111) on layered-2D Bi2Se3 (0001) substrates in an MOCVD reactor.