Exhaust Gas Simulation Validation via Concentration Time Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of established methods for effectively evaluating the validity of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation results for exhaust gas flow in internal combustion engine exhaust pipes, as existing techniques require numerous measurement points, increasing workload and not providing a clear relationship between simulation and actual measurement data.

Innovation Solution

A method involving computer simulations and actual measurements is applied to the exhaust gas flow in the exhaust pipe, comparing analysis data with measurement data by setting specific conditions, dividing the pipe into finite elements, and calculating time intervals for concentration changes, to determine the validity of the simulation results within a predetermined correlation range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fluid velocity is measured at a large number of measurement points to compare simulation and actual data, then measurement precision is improved, but work load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidwork load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and compares only the essential characteristic - the time interval of concentration change - rather than measuring fluid velocity at numerous points. By focusing on this single key parameter that represents the overall flow behavior, the method achieves validation without the extensive measurement workload that would be required to capture complete velocity distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces concentration change as an intermediary parameter that indirectly represents fluid velocity characteristics. Instead of directly measuring and comparing velocity fields, the method uses concentration change time intervals as a mediator that correlates with flow behavior, thereby simplifying the comparison between simulation and actual data while maintaining validation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If fluid velocity is measured at multiple measurement points to establish relationship between simulation and actual data, then reliability of simulation evaluation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential validation information from complex velocity field measurements by focusing solely on the time interval of concentration change. This extraction approach maintains reliability by capturing the fundamental flow characteristic while avoiding the need for complex multi-point measurement systems and data processing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified representation of the flow behavior by measuring concentration change over time, which serves as a copy or proxy for the more complex velocity field. This single time interval measurement effectively copies the essential dynamic behavior of the exhaust gas flow, enabling reliable simulation validation without complex measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10663444B2Method for evaluating exhaust gas simulation
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 DENSO CORP
  • US10663444B2 patent drawing
  • US10663444B2 patent drawing
  • US10663444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Evaluation method of exhaust gas simulation capable of simply and appropriately evaluating the validity of the simulation is provided. In analysis data, an analysis amplitude curve is calculated in which a change in the concentration of virtual exhaust gas at the observation point in the converged pipe portion is plotted, and an analysis time interval between the zero point and the reference point in the analysis amplitude curve is plotted. In actual measurement data, an actual amplitude curve is provided in which a change in the specific gas component at an observation point is measured with time, and an actual time interval is provided in which a time interval from a zero point to a reference point in the actual amplitude curve. The analysis data is determined as valid when a difference between the analysis time interval and the actual time interval is within a predetermined correlation range.