Kitchen Exhaust Hood Control for Cross-Draft Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Exhaust hoods in commercial kitchens waste energy by drawing excessive conditioned air to capture contaminants, due to unpredictable cross-drafts and variations in contaminant generation rates, leading to inefficiencies and high energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adjustable side skirts and advanced control systems that utilize sensors and motor-driven mechanisms to optimize exhaust flow rates and containment, combined with the use of horizontal and vertical jets to minimize air extraction while maintaining effective contaminant capture and containment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If exhaust hoods draw air at high rates to ensure complete contaminant capture, then contaminant containment is improved, but energy consumption increases due to excessive conditioned air extraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant containmentVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust system employs variable speed fans and adjustable dampers that dynamically modulate exhaust flow rates based on real-time contaminant sensor readings, allowing the system to maintain reliable contaminant containment while extracting only the minimum necessary conditioned air, thereby reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor arrays detect contaminant presence and concentration levels, feeding this information back to the control system which adjusts exhaust fan speed and damper positions accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes the balance between contaminant containment reliability and energy-efficient conditioned air extraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If exhaust flow rates are increased to handle unpredictable cross-drafts, then contaminant capture reliability is improved, but the amount of conditioned air wasted increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant captureVSAvoidconditioned air
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system preemptively detects cross-draft conditions through sensor arrays and adjusts exhaust flow rates in advance to counteract their disruptive effects on contaminant plumes, maintaining reliable contaminant capture without permanently operating at excessively high flow rates that would waste conditioned air during normal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The exhaust system dynamically adjusts its operational parameters in response to detected cross-draft conditions, temporarily increasing flow rates only when and where needed to maintain contaminant capture reliability, rather than operating at constant high rates that would unnecessarily waste conditioned air

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If exhaust hoods are designed for worst-case scenarios, then contaminant containment under extreme conditions is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant containmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust system uses sensor arrays and automated control algorithms to autonomously detect contaminant levels and adjust operational parameters, replacing complex manual balancing systems and providing adaptive worst-case protection without requiring oversized fixed-capacity equipment or intricate mechanical adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of energy

If variable speed fans and sensors are implemented to optimize exhaust rates, then energy efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy wasteVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical flow control mechanisms with electronic sensors and variable speed motor control, using electrical signals and software algorithms to optimize exhaust rates, thereby reducing energy waste while the electronic control architecture provides a more manageable form of complexity compared to mechanical adjustment systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy waste by minimizing the amount of conditioned air extracted, improving contaminant capture and containment efficiency, and enabling more precise control of ventilation systems, thereby reducing energy consumption and maintaining ideal conditions in commercial kitchens.

Implementation Method 1

The heat causes its own thermal convection-driven flow or plume 35 which must be captured by the hood within its recess 25

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal convection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS8038515B2Control of exhaust systems
Publication Date: 2011.10.18 HALTON GROUP LTD
  • US8038515B2 patent drawing
  • US8038515B2 patent drawing
  • US8038515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exhaust capture and containment are enhanced by means of automatic or manual side skirts, a sensitive breach detector based on interference effects, a combination of vertical and horizontal edge jets, and/or corner jets that are directed to the center diagonally from corners. Associated control functions are described.