Integrated Exhaust Manifold Runner Cross-Section Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing exhaust manifold designs in engines lead to increased losses due to larger cross-sectional areas in inner cylinder exhaust runners, which reduce energy delivery to the turbine and limit engine performance and fuel economy, while the two-piece water jacket design causes boundary layers that hinder exhaust flow.

Innovation Solution

The cylinder head incorporates a first exhaust runner with a reduced cross-sectional area to concentrate exhaust gases and a second exhaust runner with a varying cross-sectional area and lead-in angle to control boundary layers, optimizing gas flow and reducing losses within the exhaust manifold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the cross-sectional area of inner cylinder exhaust runners is increased, then the exhaust manifold can accommodate more flow, but energy losses increase and less energy is delivered to the turbine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexhaust gas flow capacityVSAvoidenergy loss in exhaust manifold
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust manifold employs different cross-sectional areas for different cylinder positions. Inner cylinder exhaust runners have reduced cross-sectional areas compared to outer cylinder exhaust runners. This local differentiation optimizes the balance between flow capacity and energy loss by matching the runner size to the actual flow requirements of each cylinder position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If the cross-sectional area of outer cylinder exhaust runners is increased, then flow capacity increases, but boundary layers form that limit exhaust flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexhaust gas flow capacityVSAvoidboundary layer formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Outer cylinder exhaust runners are designed with larger cross-sectional areas than inner cylinder runners. This local differentiation helps manage boundary layer development by providing sufficient flow area in outer cylinders where boundary layers are more pronounced, while avoiding excessive area in inner cylinders where it would cause energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If a two-piece water jacket design is used, then cooling of the exhaust manifold is improved, but boundary layers are created that hinder exhaust flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexhaust manifold coolingVSAvoidboundary layer formation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The water jacket is divided into multiple sections with coolant passages positioned at different locations. This segmentation allows strategic placement of cooling passages to maximize heat removal from critical exhaust manifold regions while minimizing interference with exhaust flow paths and boundary layer development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8839759B2Integrated exhaust manifold
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8839759B2 patent drawing
  • US8839759B2 patent drawing
  • US8839759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cylinder head of an engine with an integrated exhaust manifold is provided. In one example, the inner exhaust runners and outer exhaust runners have different cross-sectional areas. This arrangement may be beneficial to maintain exhaust flow rates in the integrated exhaust manifold.