Exhaust Gas Mixer with Dynamic Flow Cross-Section Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixer arrangements for exhaust gas systems face inefficiencies due to varying engine parameters, such as load and speed, which affect the swirling and mixing of additives, leading to inconsistent exhaust gas flow and reduced mixer performance.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a regulating body that varies the flow cross-section within the mixer arrangement, allowing for adjustment of the exhaust gas flow ratio and minimizing variance through active or passive control, ensuring consistent mixing and swirling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the exhaust gas mass flow A1 through the mixer is allowed to vary with engine parameters, then the mixer arrangement can adapt to different operating conditions, but the mixer performance becomes inconsistent due to varying swirling efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to engine operating conditionsVSAvoidconsistency of mixing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the flow cross-section Q dynamically adjustable through a regulating body (such as a damper or valve). This allows the system to adapt to varying engine operating conditions while maintaining optimal mixing performance. The regulating body modifies the flow cross-section in response to changing exhaust gas mass flow A, ensuring that the mixing process remains efficient across different engine loads and speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the flow cross-section Q is kept constant, then the mixer structure can be simplified, but the mixing performance deteriorates under varying engine loads and speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of mixer structureVSAvoidmixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by introducing a dynamically adjustable flow cross-section Q through a regulating body. While this adds some structural complexity, it enables the mixer to maintain high productivity and mixing efficiency under varying engine conditions. The regulating body (damper or valve) provides a relatively simple mechanism that significantly improves mixing performance across different operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the exhaust gas mass flow A1 through the mixer varies with engine parameters, then the system can respond to changing operating conditions, but the variance range ΔA1 increases leading to reduced swirling efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to engine parametersVSAvoidvariance in exhaust gas flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by using a regulating body to dynamically adjust the flow cross-section Q, which in turn stabilizes the exhaust gas mass flow A1 through the mixer. This dynamic adjustment compensates for variations in engine parameters, reducing the variance range ΔA1 while maintaining adaptability to different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control where the regulating body responds to changes in exhaust gas mass flow A and engine parameters by adjusting the flow cross-section Q. This feedback mechanism helps maintain a stable exhaust gas mass flow A1, reducing variance and improving swirling efficiency while still allowing the system to adapt to different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration optimizes mixer performance by maintaining consistent injection conditions across different engine operating conditions, enhancing the homogeneity of additive mixing and reducing the variance in exhaust gas flow, thereby increasing the efficiency of the swirling process.

Implementation Method 1

a mixer for swirling the exhaust gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirling flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

an injection device by means of which an additive can be injected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11738313B2Mixer arrangement and method for operating a mixer arrangement
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY INC
  • US11738313B2 patent drawing
  • US11738313B2 patent drawing
  • US11738313B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mixer arrangement for an exhaust gas system, having an inlet opening through which an exhaust gas mass flow (A) can be guided, and a mixer for swirling the exhaust gas, which has at least one inflow opening that is fluidically connected to the inlet opening, wherein at least one first portion (A1) of the exhaust gas mass flow (A) can be guided through the mixer via the at least one inflow opening, an injection device by means of which an additive can be injected, and a bypass having at least one throughflow opening which is fluidically connected to the inlet opening and through which a second portion (A2) of the exhaust gas mass flow (A) can be guided past the mixer, there being provided at least one regulating body by means of which a flow cross-section Q in the mixer arrangement can be varied such that a ratio V with (formula I) can be varied.