Exhaust Sensor Reversal Detection in Aftertreatment Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The improper installation of exhaust sensors in aftertreatment systems can lead to incorrect readings, causing inefficiencies in the reduction of substances like nitrogen oxides, resulting in potential emissions violations and misdiagnosis of other system faults.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for diagnosing the correct positioning of exhaust sensors by comparing measurement values from sensors located upstream and downstream of the additive supply, with correction mechanisms to ensure accurate sensor signal interpretation and limited adjustments to maintain vehicle performance until proper relocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If exhaust sensors are installed in aftertreatment systems, then emission reduction can be monitored, but sensor installation errors can cause incorrect readings and system inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission reduction monitoringVSAvoidsensor reading accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic checks by comparing sensor readings before and after additive injection to detect installation errors before they cause significant emission problems. The control unit analyzes whether the downstream sensor reading is logically consistent with upstream readings and expected reduction levels, enabling early detection of reversed or misplaced sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor readings from both upstream and downstream positions, comparing actual measurements against expected values based on additive injection levels and engine operating conditions. This feedback loop enables real-time detection of sensor installation errors and triggers appropriate diagnostic routines or warning signals to the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If sensor locations are reversed, then measurement values become incorrect, but the system should automatically detect and diagnose the issue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic fault detectionVSAvoidcorrect sensor signal interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously compares upstream and downstream sensor readings against expected physical relationships. When the downstream sensor reading indicates higher pollution levels than upstream (which is physically impossible during proper operation), the system triggers a diagnostic fault indication, automatically detecting the installation error without requiring manual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnostic system performs self-diagnosis by analyzing its own sensor data to detect installation errors. The control unit uses built-in logic to compare sensor readings and automatically identifies inconsistent patterns that indicate reversed sensors, enabling the system to self-diagnose without external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If additive supply is increased to ensure reduction, then emission compliance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission complianceVSAvoidsystem control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions using the same sensor readings: it monitors emission levels for compliance, detects sensor installation errors through diagnostic comparisons, and adjusts additive supply based on actual measured pollution levels. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate diagnostic hardware while maintaining emission compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures proper operation of aftertreatment systems by accurately identifying and mitigating the effects of reversed sensors, maintaining vehicle performance and compliance with emission standards.

Implementation Method 1

an aftertreatment system is arranged for reduction of at least one substance resulting from combustion by supplying an additive comprising a reagent to an exhaust gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11053879B2Method and system for diagnosing exhaust sensors
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 SCANIA CV AB
  • US11053879B2 patent drawing
  • US11053879B2 patent drawing
  • US11053879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for diagnosing exhaust sensors, where at least one substance resulting from combustion is reduced by an additive. A first sensor intended to measure an occurrence of said substance upstream said supply of additive, and a second sensor intended to measure an occurrence of said substance downstream said supply of additive. The method comprises: determining whether the locations of said first and second sensors are reversed by: determining if a second measurement value of said second sensor exceeds a corresponding first measurement value of said first sensor at least to a first extent, and when this condition occurs, determining that the locations of said first and second sensors sensor are reversed, said measurement values are determined when a supply of additive is set to obtain at least a first reduction of said at least one substance to be reduced.