Exhaust System Feedforward Feedback Control NOx Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exhaust systems for internal combustion engines, such as those using Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), may fail to optimally control reductant injection due to neglecting critical factors like SCR catalyst temperature and exhaust flow rate, leading to sub-optimal NOX reduction and unnecessary reductant waste.

Innovation Solution

An exhaust system with sensors to monitor operational and performance parameters of the reduction catalyst, including temperature and flow rate, and a controller that adjusts reductant injection based on NOX production and catalyst performance, implementing both feedforward and feedback control mechanisms to optimize reductant use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If reductant injection is regulated based only on fuel flow, throttle setting, engine speed, and exhaust gas temperature, then the control system is simpler, but the NOX reduction efficiency is sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidNOX reduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by using sensors to measure actual NOX levels and NH3 slip downstream of the SCR catalyst, then feeding this information back to the controller to adjust reductant injection. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to optimize NOX reduction efficiency while adapting to real-time catalyst performance and operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively adjusting reductant injection based on predicted catalyst performance and operating conditions before sub-optimal reduction occurs. The controller uses feedforward control signals based on engine operating parameters and catalyst temperature to anticipate and prevent NOX reduction deficiencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If more sensors and control mechanisms are added to monitor catalyst temperature and flow rate, then the control precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst performance monitoring precisionVSAvoidsensor and control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors and flow rate sensors to continuously monitor catalyst performance and adjusts reductant injection accordingly. This enables precise control of the SCR process by adapting to real-time changes in catalyst temperature and exhaust flow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions by integrating data from various sensors (NOX sensors, NH3 sensors, temperature sensors, flow rate sensors) and coordinating reductant injection, EGR valve control, and diesel particulate filter management. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate dedicated control systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If reductant injection is increased to ensure adequate NOX reduction, then the NOX emission compliance is improved, but reductant waste and ammonia slip increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOX emission complianceVSAvoidreductant waste and ammonia slip
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from downstream NOX and NH3 sensors to precisely control reductant injection. When NOX reduction is adequate, the system reduces reductant injection to minimize waste and prevent ammonia slip. This closed-loop control ensures compliance while optimizing reductant utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes reductant injection parameters based on real-time monitoring of catalyst temperature, exhaust flow rate, and emission levels. By continuously adjusting injection rate, timing, and duration based on actual operating conditions, the system achieves optimal NOX reduction while minimizing reductant waste and ammonia slip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures precise control of reductant injection, maintaining desired NOX emission levels across varying conditions, optimizing reductant use, and minimizing ammonia slip, thereby enhancing the efficiency and responsiveness of the engine.

Implementation Method 1

SCR is a process where gaseous or liquid reductant (most commonly a solution of urea solid and water) is added to the exhaust gas stream of an engine and is adsorbed onto a catalyst. The reductant reacts with NOX in the exhaust gas to form H2O and N2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

The reductant reacts with NOX in the exhaust gas to form H2O and N2, which can be safely released to the atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

a first sensor located to generate a first signal indicative of an operational parameter of the reduction catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas sensing: Absorption Spectroscopy

Implementation Method 4

a second sensor located downstream of the reduction catalyst to generate a second signal indicative of a performance parameter of the reduction catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas sensing: Absorption Spectroscopy

Data Source

PatentUS7832200B2Exhaust system implementing feedforward and feedback control
Publication Date: 2010.11.16 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US7832200B2 patent drawing
  • US7832200B2 patent drawing
  • US7832200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exhaust system for use with a combustion engine is disclosed. The exhaust system may have an exhaust passageway, and a reduction catalyst disposed within the exhaust passageway. The exhaust system may also have a first sensor located to generate a first signal indicative of an operational parameter of the reduction catalyst, and a second sensor located to generate a second signal indicative of a performance parameter of the reduction catalyst. The exhaust system may further have an injection device located to inject reductant upstream of the reduction catalyst, and a controller in communication with the combustion engine, the first sensor, the second sensor, and the injection device. The controller may be configured to determine a NOX production of the combustion engine, determine an amount of reductant that should be injected based on the NOX production and the first signal, and adjust the amount based on the second signal.