Extended Low Contrast Detectability for CT Scanner Protocol Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current low contrast detectability (LCD) methods in CT scanners characterize performance at only one protocol, failing to account for the full operating range and patient sizes, leading to inaccurate contrast performance assessment and inability to differentiate between scanners.

Innovation Solution

The Extended Low Contrast Detectability (ExLCD) method measures contrast performance over a range of protocols and patient sizes using a flux index and contrast index, enabling characterization of radiographic imaging systems and optimization of scanning protocols for improved image quality at lower doses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If radiation dose is reduced to lower risk of radiation induced cancer, then safety is improved, but image quality deteriorates due to increased image noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation induced cancer riskVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by measuring low contrast detectability across multiple protocols with varying parameters (tube current, slice thickness, scan time, dose index) rather than a single protocol. This creates a comprehensive performance function that characterizes scanner behavior across the full operating range, enabling optimization at reduced doses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from single-protocol LCD measurement to multi-protocol ExLCD measurement, adding dimensional complexity by incorporating multiple protocol parameters (tube current, slice thickness, scan time, dose index) to create a comprehensive performance characterization that captures scanner behavior across the full operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If LCD is measured at a single protocol, then measurement simplicity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates because it fails to characterize performance over the full operating range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement complexityVSAvoidcontrast performance characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process into multiple discrete protocol measurements across the full operating range, then combines them into a comprehensive performance function. This segmentation allows systematic characterization of scanner behavior at different operating points while maintaining organized, manageable measurement procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary measurements across multiple protocols to establish the performance function before actual clinical use. This preliminary characterization enables subsequent optimization and comparison without requiring repeated multi-protocol measurements, saving time while ensuring accurate performance knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple protocols are measured to characterize full operating range, then measurement precision is improved, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance characterization accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal performance function that characterizes scanner behavior across all protocols simultaneously. This single comprehensive function serves multiple purposes: performance comparison, protocol optimization, and quality assurance, eliminating the need for separate measurements for each purpose and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses phantom objects with known contrast properties as standardized test targets that can be replicated across multiple protocols. These phantom copies provide consistent, measurable references that enable systematic comparison across different operating conditions without requiring complex variable targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

ExLCD provides a robust capability to connect x-ray dose with image quality metrics, allowing for QA testing, comparison of imaging systems, standardization of protocols, and optimization of scanning protocols for better image quality at lower doses, thereby enhancing the ability to detect smaller, lower contrast objects.

Implementation Method 1

imaging a phantom containing a plurality of objects over each of the protocols

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray transmission and detection: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS8891849B2Extended low contrast detectability for radiographic imaging systems
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 TIP IMAGING LLC
  • US8891849B2 patent drawing
  • US8891849B2 patent drawing
  • US8891849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining an extended low contrast detectability performance function for an operating range for a core operating mode of a radiographic imaging system using actual reconstructed images characterize the contrast performance of a radiographic imaging system over its operating range and for any patient size based on the off-line calibration, uses ordered pairs of flux index and contrast index for each scanned object to provide a contrast index for each protocol for each contrast set, and uses the ordered pairs of flux index and contrast index to determine an extended low contrast detectability performance function for the operating range of a radiographic imaging system. Extended low contrast detectability performance data compilation and methods of clinical use, and low contrast phantom configurations and methods of calibration are also disclosed.