Exoskeleton Robotic Teleoperation With Tactile Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a system that allows humans to perform dangerous tasks remotely, without direct intervention, by controlling robotic devices that can handle hazardous materials or operate in dangerous environments, ensuring safety and control.

Innovation Solution

A robotic assembly control system comprising an exoskeleton apparatus worn by the user to control robotic assemblies and mobile platforms, with sensors mapping user movements to remotely operate robotic devices, including potentiometers, compliance sections, and tactile feedback mechanisms for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a human performs dangerous tasks directly, then task completion is immediate and direct, but the human is exposed to hazardous materials and physical injury risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman safetyVSAvoidtask execution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a robotic assembly as an intermediary device between the human operator and the hazardous environment. The robotic assembly performs the dangerous tasks while the human operates it remotely through the exoskeleton control system, thus protecting the human from direct exposure to hazards while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct human mechanical action with a robotic mechanical system controlled by the exoskeleton. The robotic assembly's actuators and mechanisms perform the physical tasks that would otherwise require direct human intervention, substituting human mechanical effort with automated robotic execution under remote control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a robotic assembly is used to perform dangerous tasks, then human safety is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman safetyVSAvoidrobotic system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exoskeleton apparatus serves multiple functions: it provides sensor input for control, delivers tactile feedback to the operator, and interfaces with the robotic assembly control system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and simplifies the overall system architecture despite the advanced capabilities provided

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where sensors on the robotic assembly detect task conditions and transmit this information through the exoskeleton to the operator. This feedback mechanism enables the operator to adjust control signals in real-time, simplifying the control process and improving system adaptability without increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If remote control is implemented, then human exposure to hazards is reduced, but control precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman safetyVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tactile feedback mechanism in the exoskeleton provides real-time sensory information about the robotic assembly's position, force, and environmental conditions directly to the operator's hand. This feedback enables precise control adjustments without the operator needing to be physically present, maintaining control accuracy while enabling remote operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical coupling between the operator and robotic assembly with a sensor-based control system. Sensors on the robotic assembly and in the exoskeleton substitute for direct mechanical feedback, transmitting control signals and sensory data electronically to maintain precise control at a distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and precise remote operation of robotic devices, allowing humans to perform hazardous tasks without risk, with the exoskeleton system providing intuitive control and feedback for effective task execution.

Implementation Method 1

the compliance section is a torsion spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

measuring the shoulder abduction with at least one potentiometer, measuring the shoulder flexion with at least one potentiometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive sensing: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10888439B2System and apparatus for robotic device and methods of using thereof
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 DEKA PRODUCTS LP
  • US10888439B2 patent drawing
  • US10888439B2 patent drawing
  • US10888439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic assembly control system is disclosed. The robotic assembly control system includes an exoskeleton apparatus adapted to be worn by a user, at least one robotic assembly, the at least one robotic assembly controlled by the user by way of the exoskeleton, and at least one mobile platform, the at least one mobile platform controlled by the user and wherein the at least one robotic assembly is attached to the at least one mobile platform.